Well if we ever see a M1A2 SEPv4 in game, an LWS (that can differentiate between rangefinding, designation and Beam riding sources), with the system planned being the AN/VVR-4.
And depending on what exactly the M1E3 retains from the SEP v4 there is a chance that it may be similarly equipt.
Considering the 2A7V, Strv 122s and BVM don’t have LWS; not really
Because ariete players tend to actually play it to its strengths and do decently well. Abrams is my favorite thing to face as well lol
still haven given an answer as to why gaijin made a video of a patriot missile firing at a russian jet over ukraine, but we ge in trouble for talking about it lol.
the italians are always grouped up with the russias, swedish or germans leeching off their winrates, italy has nothing to counter air, and when italy doesn’t have germans, sweden or russians they get over run.
SHOULD I LINK THE ONE WHEN ME AND 5 OTHER PLAYERS shut you down? Nothing you people say or gaijin says matters, i already know the abrams has D.U and spall liners. Gaijin has a biased and terrible dev team who haven’t fixed any of the many bugs reported over the years. Nothing that gaijin says or types , states etc has any effect on real world documents from government sources. Gaijin and its " beliefs " has no credibility at all.
But it doesn’t? Both have been disproven multiple times… yet you still insist they do
yes it does this has already been proven. You people keep listening to gaijin and i’ll just keep laughing. D.U has been built into every single Abrams made after 1998, and all M1A1s started receiving D.U upgrades in 1988. All U.S Made MBTs have spall liners. the M60A3 TTS has spall liners, the XM-1 had spall liners, the Stryker’s have spall liners.
You and people like you still don’t see how gaijin is out right ignoring bug reports and actual data, and none of you seem to care of question why gaijin asa company has sat and lied to you all about " historical accuracy "
They won’t fix their own mistakes and ignore things like the Stinger having a 20-22g load , and gaijin actually had the nerve to ignore this report and give it a 13g load, because they don’t believe it could be better than their own missile.
generation-3-stinger-and-mistral.pdf
the M735 still hasn’t been fixed.
The TOW 2B is virtually useless
the Apache still hasn’t gotten the AGM-65s
They still haven’t fixed the turret ring on the Abrams or lowered it. yet you all keep repeating gaijins obvious lies.
Oh and lets not forget how the strela is still immune to counter measures, but they’ll make a video showing a apache flaring the strela launch and the missile missing.
Gaijian lying directly to everyone in their own trailers
Except I’ve seen proof that only 5 had gotten DU… and unless the US publically and explicitly states that their tanks have DU in them then there’s no need to add it. There’s no explicit proof. Unless anybody has classified documents. Further, there’s no explicit proof they had spall liners. Crews have even stated they had no spall liners.
As for the rest of your rant about how the US needs fixes (irrelevant to the spall liner and DU problem), consider the fact that they dominate most BR’s and game modes,and that other nations need fixes too. Its not just the US. Its every other nation too.
I’d believe a mechanical item that has the same reload everytime over an human loader with a buddy who writes his 7.21 down as a 6.21.
Also sartt… my guy… your still salty over that trailer?
Guess what, I guess stinger biased because my ircm on my Mi-24D and preflaring does nothing against it
Agava was on the T-80B
Agava-2 was on the T-80Us which was considered gen 2
Italy suffer > Russia suffering > USA suffering > Germany suffering
I was talking about WT, so-
T-80U’s thermals are Gen 1 in game.
Eh Russia’s far from it, the tanks individually aren’t the best but the overall lineup is pretty great.
That’s the one where another 5 people realized you were delusional and your ‘source’ was not only not a source, but only a company who simply stated ‘we make spall liners; specifically for MRAP’s’
So you know autoloaders cant be repaired in a battle too right ? and are prone to malfunctions. should we include the ability for a autoloader to jam and not be able to fire? Should we make it so when the autoloader is damaged or knocked out your tank can’t fires until you return to a base to repair it?
I still don’t know what " 7.21 down as a 6.21. " means or why you keep typing it.
No you read a sub committee report from the D.U being added to the turrets and hulls from 1992 which is when they FIRST added 5 D.U hulls to test at a army school in the 1980s Gaijin can’t even get the year right when even those 5 tanks go them.
You all still dont know why the M1A1HA has H.A in its name
and theres 5+ people that realize you people can’t read or know what F.O.I.A requests are.
That source literally proves Gaijins point
Dude fought so hard just to realize he’s making Gaijin’s point lol.
Yet I had like 10 guys who knew what they were talking about who came in an proved you wrong.
