Stop blaming USA top tier win rates on player skill

Game Discussion Realistic Battle
374

Exactly, main reason why I mostly swapped to France instead of playing my US top tier lineup. Similar playstyle MBTs but with at least a chance of having a good team.

Problem is that Gaijin has to give the good multi nation players a reason to return to us top tier. The SEPv2 was such a worthless addition that most people just didn’t bother for it. Then the teams got way worse and the good multi nation players just decided it wasn’t worth returning to us top tier in general.

Which is partially why I want Gaijin to add the SEPv3.

2 Likes
375

As long as it comes with same inaccuracies i dont think it will cause major changes.

Turret Ring, armor values and similiar inaccuracies will also make V3 less potent compare to other top tiers.

Maybe just maybe Gaijin decides to fix those issues when V3 comes, tho i have zero belief.

2 Likes
376

1 death leavers dont tend to do much of anything. within 3 minutes its just you and like 4 other people.

1 Like
377

Is ODL just an an American problem ? You are going to need to prove that the USA as a team leave earlier than all the others.Then you need to get into why that is if its true

1 Like
378

1034? wtf

379

you could test it out by buying the click bait/aim and watch how 70% of your team is gone after 3 - 5 minutes of the match starting.

380

difference is you’ll be able to peak of a hill at tanks and they wont be able to pen the LFP, that is unless gaijin pulls another magical " we dont believe the u.s ever put d.u in any of the vehicles hulls " garbage

381

If you are peeking from behind a hill and get shot then that your problem. If you can’t scout your own surrounding before peeking then that your problem. If you having skill issue and that somehow another “Gaijin is an Anti-Nato” issue then that your problem. Maybe you should find another game where the devs aren’t a bunch of “Anti-Nato” instead of coming on here to cry about it hoping it will get fixed (it won’t)

382

Definitely a lot easier to master than T-72s/T-90 variants

1 Like
383

Not really.

384

As someone who like to pay attention to player’s kd, I really have a lot of trouble finding players with extremely high KDR on T-72/T-90, but I have a list of players who did 4.5-6 KDR on Abrams, one of them has better potential for sure, it looks like the same player hit the wall on his T-90 too.

385

Or maybe just maybe their gameplay style doesn’t suit T-90’s gameplay.

I saw multiple players who has 3+ K/D ratio in their T-72B3 and T-90M.

1 Like
386

Do they also play Abrams? I bet his kdr in them even higher

387

There should be quotation marks around the SEPV2 to be fair. Many US players call it useless, which it really isn’t. Just because Leopard 2A7V > 2A5 doesn’t mean you shouldn’t use the 2A5. Its still a decently competitive tank as a second or third spawn to your SEP.

388

Here’s where I have to correct you. Its 896 SP for KH-38MTs, if you don’t equip one of those dumb ammunition belts.

389

I mean it was a pretty useless addition. It’s litterally just a downgrade of the vehicle many people were already owning.

If it didn’t look as cool as it does, it would be the last Abrams in my spawn order (SEPv1 > M1A2/M1A1 HC > M1A1 AIM > SEPv2 in terms of performance).

390

Cant say for sure since their most played nations were Germany and Russia.

392

Well, if you peer upon my stat card, I play more Naval and ground > air, and you know my stand on helicopters as of late.

393

I know people on this forum strongly reject the suggestion of SBMM but the absolute only way to fix this MM problem is a lite SBMM(like old cod pre 2014)that somewhat equally distributes good and bad players on both teams

394

Yes with even 1 KH-38 equipped, it is 1034 sp last time I checked. Granted I was bringing R-77s too

1 Like