That’s not what the equation says.
The equation doesn’t prove flat pen at all, it translates plate thickness to amount of steel actually penetrated.
That’s not what the equation says.
The equation doesn’t prove flat pen at all, it translates plate thickness to amount of steel actually penetrated.
Fair enough. I may have misinterpreted what you were trying to say.
I do know that they use Lanz-Odermatt formula (Willi Odermatt’s), though I don’t understand what point you’re trying to convey.
If you care about which shell can penetrate armour at angles better, the stat card shows it.
There’s no real reason to calculate the amount of LOS steel that is penetrated, as the round with better angle performance shown on the stat card would have told you that already.
I apologize that the post you replied to was poorly written BTW. I could’ve made it less harsh to read.
Glad we got to an understanding.
Should M1A1 AIM get tusk
useless armor package in war thunder
wouldnt be useless if they fix it but yeah
absolutely, but its its not happening, EVERY single western armor package is vastly underperfoming
Because I don’t commonly play air, like I commonly play ground has no real relevance now does it?
The bingo list is just a good list of excuses haha.
You know, I try to be amicable, but coming into the topic the way you did is just distasteful.
Sorry, just that it seemed a bit arrogant when I know we’ve had discussions before on Russian vehicles that (funnily enough) are your most favourite vehicles. 😅
I guess, though some of the things on the list seemed reasonable.
I mean… I think we can all agree that the M1A2 SEP V2 is worse than the Sep V1.
Even @MagikWT said it himself:
So from what I can understand, instead of just unreasonable / funny takes being on the list, it’s just common complaints from US mains.
So I’d like to see Italian / French / Israeli bingo cards with stuff like ‘No good top tier SPAA’, ‘Better Leclerc Shell’, ‘Merkava turret armour not properly modelled’, etc…
Though I’m guessing that probably wouldn’t be as fun.
Yeah, and those complaints are either irrelevant or not even valid.
To be fair, the SEPv2 should definitely be put in a folder. Players should not have to grind 400k RP for what is essentially a hard downgrade over the previous vehicle (SEPv1).
Either that or just make the era package optional.
Ok sure, do that then.
Not gonna lie, i will do 1 spawn-leave if i teamup with USA lol
I mean we asked Gaijin many times, but they are set in their mind on that the SEPv2 was a worthwhile addition and is clearly not a downgrade over the SEPv1 (they are wrong of course, but there really is no convincing them and their wisdom).
I mean, speaking from experience, they’ve given the USSR so many similar (and useless vehicles ahem BTR-80 ahem ) to grind through its not funny
Im sorry but as long as teams like this, its impossible to win no matter how hard you try…
Gaijin needs to do something about this.
So you got ten kills in the “Unplayable” M1 yet all your team bailed so I think we can say its is the players not the tanks that make USA so bad.
Actually i got 1 kill and 3 assist on my RDF/LT and jumped straight to my F-16C/15E combo.
Abrams is not as bad as people claim but it certainly has multiple inaccuracies and its not an easy tank to play nor master.
Needless to say something has to be done about this.