Or maybe just maybe their gameplay style doesn’t suit T-90’s gameplay.
I saw multiple players who has 3+ K/D ratio in their T-72B3 and T-90M.
Or maybe just maybe their gameplay style doesn’t suit T-90’s gameplay.
I saw multiple players who has 3+ K/D ratio in their T-72B3 and T-90M.
Do they also play Abrams? I bet his kdr in them even higher
There should be quotation marks around the SEPV2 to be fair. Many US players call it useless, which it really isn’t. Just because Leopard 2A7V > 2A5 doesn’t mean you shouldn’t use the 2A5. Its still a decently competitive tank as a second or third spawn to your SEP.
Here’s where I have to correct you. Its 896 SP for KH-38MTs, if you don’t equip one of those dumb ammunition belts.
I mean it was a pretty useless addition. It’s litterally just a downgrade of the vehicle many people were already owning.
If it didn’t look as cool as it does, it would be the last Abrams in my spawn order (SEPv1 > M1A2/M1A1 HC > M1A1 AIM > SEPv2 in terms of performance).
Cant say for sure since their most played nations were Germany and Russia.
Well, if you peer upon my stat card, I play more Naval and ground > air, and you know my stand on helicopters as of late.
I know people on this forum strongly reject the suggestion of SBMM but the absolute only way to fix this MM problem is a lite SBMM(like old cod pre 2014)that somewhat equally distributes good and bad players on both teams
Yes with even 1 KH-38 equipped, it is 1034 sp last time I checked. Granted I was bringing R-77s too
Yes, in fact they are.
You have:
Vs abrams which has bigger weak point and a “nato” hump being its failings.
Or maybe just maybe their gameplay style doesn’t suit T-90’s gameplay.
I saw multiple players who has 3+ K/D ratio in their T-72B3 and T-90M.
Is this why Russia is being played less and less?
T-90M’s play style is urban / long range maps. Anytime it has to push a corner / face multiple enemies within 7.1 secs it’s going to die.
Abrams can retreat out of most situations and reload 2.1 secs faster (biased reload btw) and has a better round.
what u mean bias reload
Factually speaking a 5.0 sec reload for an ace crew is inaccurate. If it was 5.5 or 5.75 secs it would be more realistic. Many videos disprove the 5.0 sec reload being correct
Every time you reply to me you prove more and more how truly stupid you are.
Factually speaking a 5.0 sec reload for an ace crew is inaccurate
the U.S Army Loader school requires 3- 5 seconds reloading to pass to be a combat ready loader.
Abrams tank #tank reload
Many videos disprove the 5.0 sec reload being correct
videos shooting at a range isn’t combat readiness speeds, there have been plenty of videos showing abrams, leopards, challengers all loading under 5 seconds
If you’re so confident, please, prove it. I’d love to see it
no
I hate to break it to you. The army may require a 6.0 sec time, but often they never get it. People pencil in fake numbers often.
So then you agree it’s false
and your evidence for that is?