Yes, in fact they are.
You have:
Vs abrams which has bigger weak point and a “nato” hump being its failings.
Is this why Russia is being played less and less?
T-90M’s play style is urban / long range maps. Anytime it has to push a corner / face multiple enemies within 7.1 secs it’s going to die.
Abrams can retreat out of most situations and reload 2.1 secs faster (biased reload btw) and has a better round.
what u mean bias reload
Factually speaking a 5.0 sec reload for an ace crew is inaccurate. If it was 5.5 or 5.75 secs it would be more realistic. Many videos disprove the 5.0 sec reload being correct
Every time you reply to me you prove more and more how truly stupid you are.
the U.S Army Loader school requires 3- 5 seconds reloading to pass to be a combat ready loader.
Abrams tank #tank reload
videos shooting at a range isn’t combat readiness speeds, there have been plenty of videos showing abrams, leopards, challengers all loading under 5 seconds
If you’re so confident, please, prove it. I’d love to see it
no
I hate to break it to you. The army may require a 6.0 sec time, but often they never get it. People pencil in fake numbers often.
So then you agree it’s false
and your evidence for that is?
Oh just the hundreds of video showing the abrams loaders on average load a 6.5ish second load time.
6.0 seconds would be a fail and they wouldnt be a loader. This isn’t a debate, this is rule in the u.s tanker school.
I’m glad be both think the abrams reloads to quickly.
i just linked you a video of a loader loading in 4.4 seconds
There is no link.
when did i say that
people like you are why this forums is half baked bro
“He didnt agree with me but also didnt say anything so he must agree with me”
like bro
Because you can’t disprove it