It’s a good tank. In fact, it’s probably second to the Leopard 2A7, but what I said wasn’t untrue.
The Strv 122 has a 6-second reload, fairly low penetration for top tier, and generation 1 thermals.
If you use the Abrams, you shouldn’t struggle with them that much when spaded. M828A2 can easily dispatch them if you aim properly.
The upper and lower plates are weak even at an angle.
This one is assuming that the Abrams is on a higher ground than the Strv 122.
something to do with leveling the camera with the gun being bad. Somebody, likely Necrons, still have the little thing he usually posts when somebody does that.
all the ammo above 9.0 can penetrate a Abrams below the turret. You dont even need to aim at a abrams to cripple it. As a matter of a fact, you cant even Hull down in a sep v2 or any of the abrams you can use HE to kill the abrams. you just fire at the guns an OVER PRESSURE THE TANK. You cant over pressure a LEO 2A7 or a strv. this why everytime i hear you say the abrams is better i truly wonder if you all have been playing this game. there are people who bring 30F26 just to kill abrams.
Hate to be that guy, but the additional add on roof armor on the Strv 122 should trigger HE and overpressure the turret iirc
the mine protection add on?
people have called necrons out of his lies for years, even when someone posted a picture to him showing the abrams is taller than the T series, he continues to aim incorrectly with russian ammo so every time they fire the shell " auto bounces " off the abrams UFP
why reverse, when you can just Hold W, that is unless theres a STRV in your path.
And it’s still far more accurate than Soviet 30mms.
Nothing is artificially nerfed. I get that it’s a waste to play Soviets, but calling them NATO is dumb.
Players got worse according to your post here.
So your proof is that NATO tanks do as well as Soviet tanks… okay.
What does player skill have to do with Abrams? Abrams is the 2nd best tank no matter how much you claim American mains are bad at the game.
I must agree
Because the UFP will auto bounce shells. You can literally try this in a test drive or a custom game.
@sartt
So you’re my main account? We’re the same person…
Bold of you to make that claim when Gaijin can literally check my computer data and find out the county in Washington state I live in.
Alt-accounts are against the rules.
A lot of people say a lot of things, you and me included, doesn’t mean it’s all true.
Sure he could be lying, or the people calling him out are salty that they lost an argument. I don’t agree with every point he makes (same is true the other way around probably), and if someone makes a good argument with decent proof that he is lying about X subject I would be inclined to accept that as a fact, but so far I really haven’t seen such arguments with solid proof.
Are you well?
@Hudler
Yes, as is the entire forum.
Back when matchmaker was Warsaw vs not Warsaw it made sense to grind Soviets as a necessity, but today you can grind any tech tree and queue up with your friends with that tech tree.
No wonder you suck at the game because you think the T80BVM/T90M good because it can go straight and people making the worst shot known to mankind result in the shell not penetrating. You don’t know how to play beside holding W, no wonder US WR is bad
It could be even worse since the type 10 can reload faster than 3.2 seconds
Meanwhile the Type 10 has numerous armor holes coupled with a pretty terrible LFP
(insert funny picture of Bt-5 being able to pen LFP of Type 10 from 500 meters away)
The crashout over a forum thread
😭
You are not entire forum
???
47% winrate right now.
Used to be in the mid/low 30%, so I honestly have no clue how you think the winrates have not changed.
Everything that isn’t a Leo 2A7V & Strv 122 struggles against the Leo 2A7V & Strv 122.
Yet somehow, those MBT’s such as Leclerc’s, Merkava’s, Ariete’s, Challenger 2’s, Challenger 3’s, Type 10’s, T-80BVM’s, T-90M’s, ZTZ-99A’s, VT4’s, Leo 2A6’s, etc. manage to do relatively fine -stats wise.
T-90M gets curbstomped by M1A2 (SEP)'s.
The T-90M is a downgrade from the T-80BVM, and it’s arguable whether the T-80BVM is even on-par with a M1A2 SEP, nevermind the fact that it’s significantly worse than the Leo 2 Terminators right now.
So I have no idea how you came to the conclusion that the T-90M is in any way a threat like the Leo 2’s are.
Perhaps a 6 year old?
Perhaps a 80 year old?
Regardless, these are not uncommon sights when checking stat cards of Click-Bait players.
