T-90A’s only advantage is sights + 3BM60.
T-72M2 has TAPNA, not 3BM46, plus you almost never see it, similarly to the UM2.
The 3 above mentioned tanks have a plethora of disadvantages, and are not comparable to the M1A1.
As for 3BM42 penning the right turret cheek, if you’re not facing them, and they shoot you, you’re already supposed to be dead, they only messed up and shot the cheek instead of the turret ring. They also rarely kill you through the cheek.
Mhm. M829A1 at 10.3. M322 at 9.7. M900 at 10.3. KE-W at 10.0.
Angle a pike nose; easy penetration.
Unangle a tiger; easy penetration.
And so on.
It’s like complaining about being shot and killed from the side.
so what ur saying that USSR main when face the m1a1 are not good enough to know the weakspot of a weak tank, got it
TAPNA can still pen the A1
M829A1 at 10.3 on a sad af chasis, M900 at 10.3 on a tank that has 30mm thick armor, as for M322 i have no comment because i dont play israel
but 2s25m also weak no? Nah 3bm60 better than m900, faster reload, better manuverability, lower profile
The M1A1 is not weak. This is purely a skill issue.
Yes, TAPNA can pen the M1A1. So can M829A1 vs T-90A, T-72M2, and T-80UM2. Not to mention the other disadvantages of said tanks.
3BM60 on a tank with 30mm of armor.
LITERALLY SO TRUE BRO 😭🙏🏽
faster, better 30mm armor 3bm60
i dont recall M829 can frontally pen those(and of course there is weakspot) but recall to what i said the M1A1 is basically a giant weakspot like how 3bm42 can frontally pen and turret face pen the M1A1, not to mentions that it face uptier more than a down tier and i dont think it has gen 2 thermal hmmm
9/10 arguement lead to this quote, why im i even suprise
3bm 42 should neer be able to penetrate the turret of the m1a1 since it cant penetrate the m1ip
M1IP
already have a bug report on that but its been quite a while
WASTING YOUR time with bug reports, they dont care about the u.s tech tree for tanks. they haven’t even fixed the M735 yet.
what else can we do other than trying to complain up to fix it
its been 7 months since the one i said
4 years for the merks
and bunch of abrams thats going to be 2 yrs old now
kd of 1
While this is true, you have a plethora of advantages over them. Their only advantage is armor profile, keep that in mind.
Just do what everyone else does, give them a bad review on steam and down vote them. Once gaijin said " they dont believe the Abrams had D.U hulle armor or that M8293 could penetrate russian ERA " i stopped taking them seriously as well as the obvious russian tanks that don’t explode when you hit the ammo carousels, and how russian tanks / spaas are always at lower BRs than everyone elses tanks.
Low profile, gen 2 thermal, better start up speed, better teamates(unrelated but ehhh):
I straight up quit playing the T-90A at it’s BR because the AV TURMS players were terrible, it has not gotten better with the UD and 2S38
Low Profile is prettyyyy much what I said.
T-90A and T-72M2 get Gen 3 and Gen 2 respectively, the UM2 does not.
The Abrams out-accelerates everything Russian except the T-80U/B.
ok fair enough
russia start becoming second usa because people say abrams suck in this game, so the horde goes for russia
That’s indeed player skill. Player skill starts with choosing your lineup and ends with leaving to the hangar.
