That’s indeed player skill. Player skill starts with choosing your lineup and ends with leaving to the hangar.
Welp, proves my point more. Thanks :)
Everybody goes to the NA server for an easy game don’t they ? 🤣
USA on the enemy team is a guaranteed Victory
I can confirm as I personally do this
FR before i bought the warbond shop TAM 2IP and every grb game is win, some of them i cant even get a kill, note that thats for the whole day
It’s been a year since the Click-Bait, and still no changes on winrates at all, despite being allegedly the best premium MBT in the game by many individuals here. While it’s reasonable to assume the rookie’s influx was a factor for a decent time frame (~6 months) as a justification, it becomes completely valid to blame on game-based circumstances after that, no wonder why Germany nor the USSR never had issues with their winrates at 11.7 even with their influx of rookies, or at least, like the US ever had even before the Click-Bait.
*Majority of secondary nations MBT’s. in a 1v1 with average players on every end, a SEPv2 doesn’t best a 2A7V/122 and T-90M, which are unironically their most common opposition, hence the poor performance.
ahh yes, the classic M1A1 HC gameplay from Cavenub, whose comment section is a mirror to the strawman this forum tends to replay on loop to discredit any complain to US vehicles.
Spoiler
Keep going I almost have it 🤞
You haven't played a single M1A2, not even the T-90M.
Doesn’t take a genius to determine which one’s better.
Also
Spoiler
Sep V2 is useless tho
its basically abrams but even more obese, slower, ARAT does nothing, bigger silhouette
Thanks for the Bingo I guess, full blackout next hopefully 🤞
As for your post, yes, SEP > SEP V2.
Spoiler
How is 106 - 8 even possible
look at his vehicle
1 kill for every 10 games is not real
mhm
I have almost 3000 kills in the SEP and SEPv2, and still only a win rate in the mid 30s, it’s not the abrams fault. That being said, the abrams platform after the base m1 a2 doesn’t perform the way it should historically