Stop blaming USA top tier win rates on player skill

[Magikッ]

I was talking about WT, so-
T-80U’s thermals are Gen 1 in game.

[Magikッ]

Eh Russia’s far from it, the tanks individually aren’t the best but the overall lineup is pretty great.

[Zyranovos]

That’s the one where another 5 people realized you were delusional and your ‘source’ was not only not a source, but only a company who simply stated ‘we make spall liners; specifically for MRAP’s’

[sartt]

@UniqueScorpions

I’d believe a mechanical item that has the same reload everytime over an human loader with a buddy who writes his 7.21 down as a 6.21.

So you know autoloaders cant be repaired in a battle too right ? and are prone to malfunctions. should we include the ability for a autoloader to jam and not be able to fire? Should we make it so when the autoloader is damaged or knocked out your tank can’t fires until you return to a base to repair it?

I still don’t know what " 7.21 down as a 6.21. " means or why you keep typing it.

@LegitRussianBias

Except I’ve seen proof that only 5 had gotten DU

No you read a sub committee report from the D.U being added to the turrets and hulls from 1992 which is when they FIRST added 5 D.U hulls to test at a army school in the 1980s Gaijin can’t even get the year right when even those 5 tanks go them.

You all still dont know why the M1A1HA has H.A in its name

[sartt]

and theres 5+ people that realize you people can’t read or know what F.O.I.A requests are.

[ExecutivOutcomes]

@Alan_Tovarishch

You can´t crop a source just when it suits you. It is explicit and unambiguous regarding the amount of hulls to be equipped with DU armor elements: only 5. If you find another Material Licence source saying explicitly that the authorization is for mounting DU armor on an undisclosed of hulls or reading “as needed” then that would indicate that hulls starting X year were equipped with DU armor of the current generation. However I insist, these hulls are not receiving the latest generation of armor since the later Material Licence source only mention turrets.

That source literally proves Gaijins point

[MotorolaCRO]

Dude fought so hard just to realize he’s making Gaijin’s point lol.

[Zyranovos]

Yet I had like 10 guys who knew what they were talking about who came in an proved you wrong.

[sartt]

no it doesn’t, because gaijin doesn’t know how to read U.S government documents. Let alone understand what " AS needed " means i dont know how many times i’ve read people refering to this document about the 2006 report to the 2016 report. then when we show you how to read it you all keep repeating the same regurgitated " 5 d.u tanks hulls "

Every tank made after 1998 started being built with D.U in the turret / hulls, instead of being upgraded to D.U in the turrets and the hulls

New Jersey Department of Military and Veterans Affairs

[UniqueScorpions]

I didn’t even know you could see that on the wiki.

Learn something new everyday I guess.

Sounds like a bug report needs to happen then.

[UniqueScorpions]

@sartt

@UniqueScorpions

I’d believe a mechanical item that has the same reload everytime over an human loader with a buddy who writes his 7.21 down as a 6.21.

So you know autoloaders cant be repaired in a battle too right ? and are prone to malfunctions. should we include the ability for a autoloader to jam and not be able to fire? Should we make it so when the autoloader is damaged or knocked out your tank can’t fires until you return to a base to repair it?

I still don’t know what " 7.21 down as a 6.21. " means or why you keep typing it.

oh sure. That’s why a captured Iraqi T-72 that was damaged was able to fire a continuous 3000 rounds before any repair was needed. 😂
Keep in mind, this test was done by the USA.

I’m pretty sure you can’t get crew members back irl either, but hey you get your abrams loader back on the cap everytime don’t you?

I still don’t know what " 7.21 down as a 6.21. " means or why you keep typing it

You don’t get it because you’ve never been in the armed services. The “buddy” system sometimes people put down false numbers so people pass a test… which is clearly what I said, but you couldn’t comprehend

[Zyranovos]

He’s not picked up on the fact he’s wrong multiple times.

[Zyranovos]

@sartt

Every tank made after 1998 started being built with D.U in the turret / hulls, instead of being upgraded to D.U in the turrets and the hulls

How many have been made since Y2K?

[UniqueScorpions]

Where’s your linked source?

@sartt

and theres 5+ people that realize you people can’t read or know what F.O.I.A requests are.

Irony

“I still don’t know what " 7.21 down as a 6.21. " means or why you keep typing it.”

@ExecutivOutcomes

@Alan_Tovarishch

You can´t crop a source just when it suits you. It is explicit and unambiguous regarding the amount of hulls to be equipped with DU armor elements: only 5. If you find another Material Licence source saying explicitly that the authorization is for mounting DU armor on an undisclosed of hulls or reading “as needed” then that would indicate that hulls starting X year were equipped with DU armor of the current generation. However I insist, these hulls are not receiving the latest generation of armor since the later Material Licence source only mention turrets.

That source literally proves Gaijins point

Thanks to the buggy mess of the abrams as is, it looks to me like all of them have D.U. When they shouldn’t ;)

[sartt]

@UniqueScorpions

I’m pretty sure you can’t get crew members back irl either, but hey you get your abrams loader back on the cap everytime don’t you?

No really " because its a game " you can’t even see through your own stupid logic. You somehow continue to cherry pick 1 instance of something happening with no proof, then when i literally linked you a video of a guy loading a abrams in 4.4 seconds you ignored it, but i bring up something about auto loaders "

@UniqueScorpions

That’s why a captured Iraqi T-72 that was damaged was able to fire a continuous 3000 rounds before any repair was needed.

WHEN IM TALKING ABOUT DAMAGED AUTOLOADERS. You randomly talk about T-72 without posting sources of a random t-72 or what was even damaged on it.

You want to see something elses? the Yak -141 IS IN THIS GAME WITH STUFF IT NEVER HAD… but the abrams can’t get its D.U Hull?

[_Renzo]

@UniqueScorpions

I’m pretty sure you can’t get crew members back irl either, but hey you get your abrams loader back on the cap everytime don’t you?

Only once per vehicle (per game though) while you could technically could repair your autoloader infinitely.

@UniqueScorpions

You don’t get it because you’ve never been in the armed services. The “buddy” system sometimes people put down false numbers so people pass a test… which is clearly what I said, but you couldn’t comprehend

Not to be that guy, but it’s not like certain nations that use the T-series have such good credibility as well (looks at the super sketchy BVM Obr 2023 video that everyone uses to proof that it has a 2+ km/h reverse speed).

[MrBombastic8]

ive check the other discussion about the T series autoloader on this forums, the average time is 6.5 seconds from what i got from multiple people
7.1 seconds is the slowest time the autoloader load, gaijin take that numba for balance
the cyclogram program isnt wrong, 6 sec is possible but that also mean tank is jam packed to the brim with all round in the carousel load which can be but unlikely

[ExecutivOutcomes]

crashing out again are we

[sartt]

@UniqueScorpions

Thanks to the buggy mess of the abrams as is, it looks to me like all of them have D.U. When they shouldn’t ;)

-.-

[MrBombastic8]

hes always like this
the more make sense arguement is that if the hull got an ke protection upgrade not DU
make sense to artificially buff the sep/sep v2 hull but the other tank like AIM and HC should just have ke increase to like resist 3bm42 or resist against high pen atgm or sth