So much wrong here obviously you don’t have a clue about the game and try to defend yourself only with trolling
APCBC has the wrong damage model in the game this same as you can say about the sabot going through armor and not do anything because stopping on modules is wrong should do spalling killing the crew
AP is a solid shot so no post destruction of the AP with post damage obviously you don’t have a clue about it
Arcade and Realistic have huge differences go check the Game explanation asking for Source it’s so childish do your research about the game go check the official Wiki
T-34-85 (d-5t) got up tiered to 5.3 but nothing has a chance with the broken ammunition his using going through Tiger IIs and Jumpo trou track many threads was buried at old forum BR -365 is used on many rus tanks and is broken as hell ’ angled pene are wrong here
Wonder why they don’t try to fix WWII US and post WWII ammunition on US - British and other nations leaving broken Rus and Chinese years now with 0 explanation and many Report tickets that say we know about the issues
Then you have 1 year now Sabot - APDS-FS broken leaving APHE dominating even if i play 8 +++ and have the option to use APHE and the worst case APCBC i will use it because Sabot and APDS-FS are broken
With TNT eq of ~170g, it will trigger an overpressure effect, killing every crew member is a single compartment (or more compartments if the explosion is large enough to go through armor that separates 2 compartments).
A Tiger 1 hitting it’s own cupola with the Pzgr will always result in 1shot (unless it overpens, which i don’t think is possible due to the penetration and thickness of the cupola).
(in a real match the radio operator would die too, it’s just the prot. analysis is bugged as always)
I don’t even understand what you say here.
Yes, shells are not realistic in game, but i was not talking about how realistic they are or how they should behave. I was talking about their in-game performance.
DAFUQ?
You have made a statement. You should be able to back it up. The burden of proof is on YOU, not me.
Me not accepting your statement unless you provide sufficient evidence is not only a reasonable thing to do from me, but also basically mandatory.
So unless you provide evidence, your statements holds no value.
OMG, 135 is greater than 100*0.94!!! Obvious russian bias here!!!
Now on the angled pen being unrealistic.
Guess what buddy, a TON of shells have unrealistic values. Both having better and worse than real performance. This is the bad part of it being standardized with a formula.
PAFSDS is not broken, as well as tungsten alloy APDS. Carbide APDS is trash, that’s true, but the alloy ones are great. If you can’t use them (especially APFSDS), then you have a massive skill issue.
Caught t-54 1949 off guard and launched 3 missiles 1000mm penetration from 40m distance to the back of the turret…the result was 3 times hit with no crew no ammo no cannon systems off… what a coincidence a russian tank again!!!
Again and again …IS-3 this time 1000mm penetration missile hit to the side and the result is no tracks broken, no crew lost, no ammo, no fuel tank , no engine failure …it continues normaly, all it needs is a fresh paint lol!!
I just hit an Italina Tiger stright on the side from 100 m with a M41 Walker Bulldog,non penetration ,nothing. Its just the random game mechanics and its across the board.
I repeat it once more , lucky times have all nations tanks but with russian tanks its almost a standard fact. You said you hit a tiger from the side , on my previous post i launhed 3 1000mm penetration missiles to the back of the t-54 1949 turret and did nothing but a hit…3 MISSILES!!! …one time is luck but 3 times …its pure stalinium at its best.
Do you really fear the russian tanks most…at all BRs?
I play from 1.0 to 8.0…russian tanks i fear are far less than german ones…i can recall fearing Zis5, T34 (42) and perhaps some IS tanks that are rare like IS3 or IS6 (not really sure as they are rare). I recall MANY more problems versus Tigers, Panthers, King Tigers…and then the M26 family…also Jumbos at the time. There are other tough tanks…even russian ones…but when i wee the enemy ID, it is not the russians that usually make me go “uh-uh” :(
I cant really believe “stalinium” if when i go in, i am pretty sure i can kill most Russian tanks…
BTW…i believe some russian tank took 3 missiles…or that at higher tiers there are some russina boogeyman…just dont see the russian bias/stalinium on a daily basis…not even close. If any nation seems to have “Tougher to kill” tanks, it would be Germany for me…
Its not about fear , its about fair play. You said you recall problems about tigers , panthers, and jumbos. I am assuming you tried to destroy them with a tank about the same BR like them probably with a cannon shell that has much more probabillity to ricochet or just hit because of the angle of attack and besides that the ratio of shell penetration against the armor thickness of these strong tanks could possibly ‘‘excuse’’ that they survived the blow they took… BUT … tanks taking a 1000mm penetration missile hit (one of them actually 3 times) and all they need is a fresh paint is simply ridiculous.
In addition its not what you or me believe about ‘‘stalinium’’ …i am presenting facts here and facts are above any opinion dont you think?
well, if you are going to be silly and shoot a t54, from the rear, into the toughest part of the tank, ie not into the soft squishy ass end, then the problem i fear, lies with you.
Facts yes. But i can choose lots of other occurrences where something odd happened and a killing blow only scratched the paint. You should not present ONE (or even a few) cases and say they represent the “normal” behaviour.
When I mentioned “fear”, my point was that there are SEVERAL nations where tanks USUALLY resist more than “expected”…and usually players “learn” that and know what targets will usually “not die”.
i once shot one of those french race cars in the back of the turret with a HE round from a large bore O-NI, 100 damage is all i got.
the truth of it?
shit happens, get over it.
Thats the most common excuse besides ‘‘this is happening with other nation tanks’ too’’ . What really matters is how frequently this happens to other nation tanks compapering to russians…
At least you got 100 damage in your case , in my cases i got an absolute zero, like i threw them rocks.
lol …listen to yourself mate really… the back of the turret of t-54 as you can see on the screenshots is max 220mm on the max angle shot and im using 1000mm penetration missiles and 3 times i got nothing and the problem is me? very Interesting opinion lol!!
So why are so many players who play the Russian tech tree struggling to get into this game and finding it a challenge? Why isn’t there an overwhelming stampede to play as Russia and utilize this amazing Stalinism? Why won’t it work for me? If you check the performance figures as they are so often released you can actually see how well all the vehicles of all nations do across the various BRs. Russia do not dominate in every position as you suggest they must.
How about I make a post about British vehicles being overly protected by the power of Tea and Optimism then find a few videos to support it? The same with Germany? USA? What is it they call it, Confirmation bias?
I would like to see these performance figures too unfortunately i havent seen them.
I believe that if someone is not a good player ‘‘stalinium’’ will not make him one, but his overall performance wiil be much better than what really is.
Pls do and provide some undoubtable evidence like i do to prove your point.
I find the idea of Stalinium funny to be honest and not offensive, but I do think in order to convince people of anything you need proof from multiple sources together to form a case. You have good piece of a puzzle but not a completed puzzle as far as I can see.
