like how the benelux subtree filled with british and american jets went to… france? lmfao
France is a NATO power at least, not the strongest NATO adversary.
1 Like
thanks for admitting that subtrees in war thunder arent always assigned to which country originally produced the vehicles
Thai MBT-2000 to Japan when?
2 Likes
hopefully soon! i for one dont mind vehicles going to multiple TTs
What did you expect from export vehicles? I mean like really, they’re meant for export, and as far as I know, sub trees exist not because of similar vehicles that the original country offers, but because of relationship.
5 Likes
and which country has the closest relationships with singapore? hint: not japan unless you count a little incident in 1942
Stop talking about politics, it’s inappropriate.
I don’t see why not, they feature some new SPAA and auto howitzers but better than nothing, lets see about K2.
Literally just going to be mostly things China got anyway, like F16, China already got through ROCAF, and MBT2k, Khalid VT4s already exist. The only thing I am expecting is HQ7 potentially aka Crotale.
China north korea though…
military history is inherently political
I’m not talking about Singapore. I’m talking about sub trees in general.
Yes, there are areas you can step into and areas you can’t.
If you can’t determine that, you shouldn’t come here.
and singapore is going to be a sub tree
They aren’t, but Singapore is not a good fit for China. China has many other options such as Pakistan, Bangladesh, Myanmar and Laos. The very same leak even mentions potentially North Korea.
And with Thailand going to Japan is seems weird to split the entire rest of ASEAN to China, who have more subtree options outside of ASEAN and more domestic vehicle options as well. And the specific nation Gaijin picked is even the most NATO leaning of them all, which I don’t think is right.
I don’t dislike the idea of Chinese subtrees, even multiple, even some ASEAN nations, but what Gaijin is doing here is just illogical.
If not Japan, then add Singapore to Israel, or make an independent ASEAN tree. China can still get other subtrees anyways.
8 Likes
For me, it’s just about wanting to see what is already there be expanded upon, not new stuff from countries that aren’t already in the tree. There’s plenty of room to grow through Pakistan, Bangladesh, Myanmar and Laos, as well as Chinese and the Republic of China. There isn’t a need for these two to be added at all in my opinion
2 Likes
Ah yes, there is a connection.
But the problem is what you can and can’t say.
It’s too vague…
Well, I’m going to bed now. It’s the middle of the night and I’ve got coronavirus.
One last thing: have fun, that’s the most important thing.
Look, it’s gone, it’s disappeared like after eating a meal.
Well, everything’s back to normal, life is back to normal.
And that’s fine…
Now, let’s talk about ASEAN.
I’m going to sleep.
What about this one tho? i saw it at the start of a video, but then the video talked and showed the china one, so im confused if this was an earlier one that got edited or the other way arround
that one was an earlier one, the leakers forgot to edit that one
so what they swapped japan with china… bit odd