What actually would be the issue with an United Korean TT though? It’s a better solution then making South Korea for example be in Japan (illogical option), of course the USA is also an option but it has a lot of option domestic options left.
Sounds like a copypaste tree, and also one that doesn’t deserve its own full tree
Where did they mention this?
Check the proposal both countries over a lot of unique domestic vehicles and unique modified foreign vehicles. Ground Tree for example has less then 25% copy n paste (mainly low tiers). However the Air Tree is underwhelming with many just being modified foreign aircraft (still unique though)
Ok where is this
Here you go, the creator has also written information regarding each vehicle so you can read the differences between the modified and original (foreign) vehicle.
My thoughts:
-
This has to be said, even though it is a separate issue, gaijin refuses to implement unique models and will use copypaste 95% of the time to make trees like this. That is an issue with their development though and not necessarily with the possibilities.
-
The proposed tree does not have a rank 1-2, which is very bad. This was problematic for Israel and doing it again is not a good idea to me.
-
That tree he gave is still majority copypaste until you hit later ranks. Then, while I’m not against adding variants, he fills out a lot of the later parts with repeat variants of the same tank.
This thread topic is stupid. “North and South Korea hate each other” is not an excuse, as a matter of fact it is a blatant lie. The majority of both North Koreans and South Koreans want unification.
Meanwhile Japan is a completely idiotic option for any subtree to be added in, especially Korea. They literally have nothing in common other than both being Asian and Japan committing unspeakable atrocities in Korea. People who want Korea added to Japan are either
- Ignorant people who don’t know history (“they are both Asian so they must be the same!!”)
- Thinly veiled fascists who support Japan and deny war crimes
- Trolls looking to provoke a response.
There is no logical nor historical basis for any Korean vehicles in the Japanese tree. There is almost no military cooperation even present-day, cold relations, and no shared basis for vehicle development. Anybody denying this is coming either from ignorance or from malice.
have you considered that some people care about gameplay and not real life psuedo-politics regarding where a nation should go in game
Of course. More logical would be to add ROK to Israel, not Japan. The two have close ties, including economic and military trade.
Why
That’s why the creator has avoided to add many more copy n paste vehicles however like you said Gaijin could introduce more copy n paste vehicle as they like because they are lazy sometimes but you could say the same when North and South Korea were to become a subtree.
It could have a rank 1/2 but it would require more copy n paste vehicles. However Air Tree could be problematic in that regard, that’s why why Rank III was better idea.
Did you check the information regarding each vehicle though?
Rank III and IV has an even mix of unique and CnP vehicles then past that the majority is unique vehicles. That there are a lot of variants should be no issue as long as they differ from each other, the major nation have the same thing so i see no issue in that.
SK to the US
North to China
I’m honestly confused why Israel should get this much sub-tech trees. Chile is argued as the best option because it uses some Israeli technology under american and other european platform which very few are ground vehicles and air vehicles that could be in-game.
South Korea even worse, I don’t see much of logic in this suggestion—South Korea in Israel as sub-tech tree. At least in my opinion is way too much out of place, I’d say that a unified korean tech tree could work greatly and hopefully this could bring a better standalone tech tree than fillers, both countries have amazing vehicles that could be in-game.
No, America has enough
Unified Korea tree is a no for me, I don’t want another Israel.
And USA mains just want more to their super sized TT, for the sake of game I want SK to Japan and NK to China or Russia
And if no one can agree on that then I propose one last thing, and that is to add shared sub TT between countries ( for example SK acsesed by us and Japan)
This is what I don’t get with people like you. Have you ever heard forgiveness??? Do you have to carry the sins of your father’s? If you think Japan is the same as it was in the 40s, you need a reality check.
japan has fewer ties to them then the US its unlikely espicially with recent addition of thailand if south korea is added it will most probably be a US subtree germany got swiss as one britains got one same with italy lots of countrys have recevied them every country will probably receive atleast one subtree
singapore will be very unlikely to go to china as they use majority of american tech so its either they add them to US or the us could get singapore
Dont add them at all. just put export vehicle in. Too much hassle and too much tribalism in those two places. i’d rather have SK export stuff in other tree like VIDAR.