well on the bright side the brits will join them in feeling like garbage then
Tornadoes flight models are accurate to known information; They have their exact +50% G-limits same as F-4E & Mig-29.
@As_H3
Well ground 11.7 is already balanced. Calling yourself a clown is weird.
If you don’t play/own them; don’t claim them as the best vehicles on the planet then?
They’re good, they’re not the best tho.
@someweirdname
Enjoy losing the bet.
Why do you think an early aircraft with a p73 is equal to an aircraft with a different radar, with better missiles and assault weapons and radar and a full-fledged PDF. 29SMT should then have 13.0, and 29A 9-12 should have 12.3
Your text to speech is playing up bro
oh lol i forgot the smt has the zhuk radar. Good luck notcing ERs now
“the FM isn’t final, the current version is a temporary one until the new code for the slats is done. It was boosted to make it more flyable in the meantime, and has been that way for awhile now. Reporting it in its current state isn’t worth doing because the original FM report is still open with all the required data in it.”
its not even close, recently found data suggests its even more out than previously thought, but that data isnt going to be used until the FM is finsihed
“The FM is wrong then, I updated my report, it’s still seriously underperforming at lower speeds.”
1 Like
What a joke, you should try comedy show dude… “you can’t directly impact vehicle performance”
First, you can not give a vehicle its right ammunition for no reason even if it not overperform (ex: OFL F2 Leclerc)
Secondly, you can not use your common sense by releasing an MBT of 56t that can be pen by ammuntion with 30mm od pen and that is litteraly not even blocking APSFDS in the front (ex: Leclerc)
1 Like
Let’s say you are right, and you’re not btw. The slats still aren’t correct.
I suggest you briefly remind yourself of all the bugs we have identified with the Tornado GR.1, F.3 and Harrier GR.7 for that matter.
Once you’ve done that, please let us know and I will be happy to start taking your opinion seriously.
so will italy and france
They wont add Hungarian MiG-29A until it’s long useless
they won’t give MICA to Mirage 2000 claiming it’s too powerful until US and Soviets have superior missiles
they did this so often that Im legit ready to bet on it
2 Likes
That’s what I say!
1 Like
sure, I’ll take a 1000GE bet
I was right every time so far, Took a Bet on tornado performance and if there’ll be a german event one last december and I sure wasn’t disappointed
Not only they won’t give MICA becausz it’s “overpowered”, but they also are helding back the matra magic 2 (razerVon I see you)
for those in the dev server, dose the first rus mig 29 get the r73 or is it just the SMT?
no only SMT and Su25BM get R-73
ASRAAM is probably needed sooner rather than later, especially needed for things like the Torando Gr4 that cant run Aim-9M. But I fear being at a BR appropriate for Brimstone with only 9Ls
they’ll eventually add it
when 9X is Meta
What i should? They shouldn’t even add the stuff that they can’t even make it properly at the begin with
The su39 and 25T get it as well per the patch notes
But you need to keep in mind the 2004 date is for production. 1998 was the completion of the approved prototype, and all of this was delayed by the fall of the Soviet union.
The complaint about proper Gen 4 planes is valid. To say that the SMT belongs in the same tier as the F-22, Rafale, and Typhoon is ridiculous though.
SMT should’ve come down the line. We’re in this situation because R-60M’s have crap range and flare resistance. The two solutions as I’ve said above are to either add the R-73 or add Fox 3’s. SMT and F-16C actually match pretty well considering both are multirole in loadouts. It sounds like the R-27ET’s are flared easily, and they replace the superior ER on the loadouts which makes them the niche lazyman’s missile at best.
How different is the mica from the ET