So we will get ANOTHER russian spaa?

RU has best AA by far compared to anyone in the game irl…and EVERY SPAA at least a modern one in the game underperforms massively!

1 Like

Russian & Soviet tanks Simulator

1 Like

This post was flagged by the community and is temporarily hidden.

1 Like

Yeah with the difference that blueside in this case is 8 tech trees and red 2.

I know but I think it’s valid to ask why the tree with the best coverage of SPAA needs another even better one

1 Like

So? Just means that no matter which nation red will face, someone will have 120D…and the Rafale

Quite sure my IRIS-T is better than the BUK…on the WHY they need it? They dont, they could just make Pantsir perform as it should or close to as it is irl but nah, they will add a new vehicle that performs like Pantsir used to perform…typical Gaijin move…this new Pantsir will get nerfed with time aswell to introduce the Pantsir S2 etc etc…money money money…nothing else really

1 Like

Learn to aim for weakspots first pls

Is the game red vs blue only?

Yeah that’s kinda my point and the question of the post, why give russia another SPAA they don’t need when other trees could really use one. Ofc it’s money but you’d thing that other trees had some money in them as well.

1 Like

And we come exactly to my point of why 120D doesnt matter same as the new SPAA doesnt matter…everyone plays vs everyone, there is no more this side vs that side! If none is crying their eyes out about the Rafale or 120D why than because of the Pantsir SM? I know, because its Russian and we must hate them by default

T90M, T80BVM, Pantsir etc etc is all the stuff an average kid can see in a certain conflict ongoing…some might hate them, some might think they are cool and want to get them. Where do you only get them? In the RU tech tree which is stupidly big thus they get bored and spend money to speed it up

1 Like

There is no need to “learn” to aim for weakspot when you shoot at center mass on the side of a T-serie MBT and it does nothing. It’s called russian bias.

1 Like

Hey guys no need to panic, the bias at 10.7 will be supressed, we’ll get another bushmaster american IFV. That’s exactly what we need to delete the bias.

But the 120D can be potentially added to 9 tech trees the new spaa gets added to one. That’s not a comparison. If the 120D was us only you’d have a point

Yeah that’s a reason but it’s still fair to ask why russia needs another good spaa just from a balance perspective

1 Like

Nah, its called skill! Shooting at such a small tank and missing EVERYTHING! Thats not a skill issue, thats a proper skill! And than you come to the forums and start yapping about them being OP…Dude yesterday my Abrams Click Bait survived 6 Atakas and a full barrage from the BMPT, survived a 38MT to the side (engine part though)! Do I call that US bias now? Nerf Abrams and go on a crusade against anything made by US?

except to anything thats red, yet red isnt yapping about them not having R-77M…or at least I havent seen it…

RU DOESNT need yet another SPAA if you look at it from a balance perspective, but balance left this game in like 2017. (btw I am one that went for RU tech tree because I like how some of the vehicles look, absolutely hate to play them though…would like to have the BMPT at some point but no way in hellI am paying 70€ for it)

Remember Gaijin saying they will never add modern jets and tanks to the game and will keep it semi as is and aim for realism? Was like 2014-15ish

It’s not called lack of skill, it’s called russian bias, because every center mass shot against NATO MBTs = tank is gone. Not for the named T-serie in the related thread we’re talking about.

Also, I hope you didn’t get that premium by yourself, it’s forbidden when you’re underaged.

1 Like

https://warthunder.com/en/tournament/replay/447331946370070211

Bru… the game is not red vs blue so there will be 120Ds on every team. The new spaa is in one tree ergo it will be on one team only.

Then just say that initially instead of making a comparison to the 120D which is needed from a balance perspective since the airframes in question are hot dogshit

1 Like

I disagree BUT not in a way you think. C5 if made anything close to similar to as it is irl and the airframes too, the US would wipe the floor with EVERYONE because they just have the best jets, period. They dont need 120D…but thats Gaijins politics, instead of fixing existing stuff they are constantly adding new and new stuff thus make the grind longer all the time and more annoying and thus more people speed it up with money… You cant separate the SPAA and 120D if you look from the money perspective…logically sure, you are right but thats not how it all works! Fixing the C5 and the old Pantsir doesnt generate income…new Pantsir and 120D do…its always the rush to get the best new thing…like with iPhones, everyone wants the newest one even though the one from 5 years ago is with a new battery and maybe a new screen JUST AS GOOD for much less money! But Apple doesnt offer you to fix the old one but to sell you a new one

I already did lol, total blitzkrieg in games, literally russia vs all

1 Like

But the best jets are seemingly not the ones getting the 120D, its exclusively for the underperformers in multiple trees.

Sure but im not looking at it from the money perspective and neither is OP, were looking at it from a balance perspective and from that perspective the 120D is explainable, the new SPAA is questionable.

1 Like

Yeah but we all together dont matter for shits! Its how Gaijin looks at it and they look at it as a business and same as in military…thers no logic there! We constantly try to find logic in what they are doing but if you add the aspect of finances to it it all makes much more sense!