So going by that might it be possible that the only reason why the BUKs stats are so bad compared to the other SPAAs is because russia is the only tech tree that has 2 viable SPAA at top tier and they compete for kills?
You should delete old posts if you wanna lie man.
I am too lazy to search for the other stuff, but it’s literally the same for anyone wondering.
1 Like
@Grossaaaa Would you look at that, me stating that Mig-29 is better around 1000kph:
But as I said, if you think I’m wrong about Mirage 2000 being a better dogfighter, you’re more than welcome to prove Statshark and all Mirage 2000 pilots wrong.
Been calling the Mirage 2000 better since 2020:
We will forget about China
what about it? looks good, a propper top tier spaa would be nice but i think they are in a place where they dont have to much but not to little
and this is the USSR
Oh, and by the way, the Buk-M3 is garbage.
at least the tiny missiles have a min range of 500m.
plus guns
Skill issue
1 Like
That's why the Pantsir has a higher K/D than the Buk
And the FSAF SAMP/T has a higher K/D than the Pantsir and the Buk.
or
Asper-30 are quite good missiles, that doesn’t turn the BUK missiles bad in themselves, they’re even harder to notch through their narrower notch width.
Russia does not deserve the best every time they’re the worst at something, but its like Gaijin is just feeding their petty ruskie mains to make them feel superior.
Anyway, enjoy your upcoming brainless SPAA.
Oh by the way, no.
yes and russia will get a second 12.7 spaa. what are you trying to tell me?
So is KD your only matric?
Skill issue on a vehicle that requires no skill to operate
1 Like
he is russian, of course he defends russian bias lol
Literally TADS positioning requires skill to be both concealed and useful enough on altitude to get a good scan of the airspace.
But I guess ruskies are simply unskilled when an SPAA requires an extra couple steps, its clear by the gap between the S1 and the BUK.
1 Like
1-button gameplay = skill, gotcha
As an owner of buk, it is garbage compared to other top SPAAs
Yeah, because K/D shows the effectiveness of equipment in combat—how often it gets destroyed and how much it accomplishes per single death.
Or do you have some other metric that would better demonstrate the effectiveness of the vehicles?
1 Like
idk if you can read but positioning = skill
but what do i expect from another russian defending the russian tt lol