not comparable…, china doesn’t even have a multi vehicle
Point is really, the new Pantsir is going to be stupid OP. It will be one of the best AA against planes and the absolute best AA against the annoying helicopters.
Russia didn’t need it at all with their Pantsir already, ESPECIALLY when 3 nations are still near unusable if you want to win at top tier due to their lack of good anti-heli AA.
1 Like
So what if he’s putting Z on am I supposed to get butt hurt about it? Multiple times I have seen people putting AZOV symbols that are literal Nazis but I don’t see anybody complaining about that because they’re the “good guys”
4 Likes
Ok I agree the pan sear is good but the point still stands why does it matter that it got added just because it got added doesn’t mean that they couldn’t add the same or similar things to the other nations just because one nation gets it doesn’t mean automatically the other one cannot
Who’s annoyed? LMFAO
It’s just funny to see the “ZOV” guy justifying the unnecessary buffed pantsir addition and the clearly political nickname standing, specially about this theme which gaijin is really hard on not condoning, props to them for that.
Remember that Bruce, the old narrator was ditched because he worked on narrating propaganda videos/documentaries, chat was disabled, a few punishments were handed here and there etc etc.
Nobody’s really mad, I’m not the one stuck in the mud for the past 4 years achieving absolutely nothing other than loss of young and able workforce, destruction of economy and deterioration of international relations ¯_(ツ)_/¯
But I’ll stop talking about this before moderation goes hard on me, I apologize in advance to whoever reads this.
At this point they can just delete those nations. Making this game a complete Russian thunder seems very appealing to some players
Agree, but with the same agrumen we can talk about the marking (letters or other) of another cuntry that is currently ethicly cleansing another occupied territory… but for them… crickets
@Realtek0 something to say about that?
2 Likes
Could you please show me where I was discussing his addition?
You have to understand one thing, by criticizing X country’s actions, I’m NOT automatically defending Y country’s actions. Who are you referring to here? Be brave and speak up.
Alright valid but I still want to say why does it matter that Russia is getting a new anti-air why not say oh good for Russia we should get the same thing Again just because Russia is getting something that doesn’t mean that other nations couldn’t
1 Like
well you’re throwing a tantrum…
It matters because this will make top tier even more unbalanced than it already was. And this is going to last for MONTHS until next patch, where we’ll maybe finally see better AA for those who actually need it.
They could have waited for other nations to get better AA first so that we have a bit of balance again. Why should Russia get yet again an OP AA that they don’t need while other nations suffers for months/years? The only reason is that the Devs have Russian favoritism. It doesn’t go further than that.
1 Like
Well that’s clearly not the same “agrumen”, that’s what we call whataboutism. But it’s fine, I get it, “agrumentation” is sometimes hard. Better work on your english aswell bud, might need it soon.
be brave and show me if I spent hours of my day arguing about a pixel; I’m not unemployed.
Nope, I’m comfortable in my room, showering everyday, eating good, with the company of my wife and my economical achievements are going just fine with good prospects to my future. I’m not the one in a torn country losing able workforce or stuck in the mud for the past 4 years
I guarantee you I am C H I L L
This is a War Thunder forum for the discussion of War Thunder matters, vehicles and more related to the game. Yes, I will spend my time in said forum for the discussion of the game discussing about the game lmfao
Edit: Hold on are we really now discussing my free will to discuss war thunder topics and the war thunder discussion forum? HUH?
So let’s do this, good Samaritan: you don’t mention me again, and I won’t mention you. On the contrary, you’re the one who’s hot-headed and who tagged me, so shut your mouth because I haven’t spoken to you at any point here. Have a good day.
Don’t tag my @ again
It’s like I’m writing one thing and you’re reading something completely different. Look here, that’s how it works. I mean, America just got the best top-tier missile, and Russia didn’t, so am I supposed to complain about that? No, because I know eventually Russia is going to get it. I just kind of need to grind my knuckles through the current state, and the same goes for AA.
Again, I understand the frustration, but just be patient; the other nations will get their SAMs.
Obviously, russia not always having the best spaa at all times is the most important issue to address.
And there are absolutely no other tech trees that have any AA gaps that should have priority!!
As you can see, there are no signficant spaa gaps in any other tech tree, so russia getting the already best SACLOS aa twice in a much better configuration while also having the best cas is totally reasonable!!
4 Likes
Btw answering this directly, I dislike atrocities committed by everyone without exception, for example Russia shouldn’t be the only one banned from the Olympics, Taiwan’s flag not being an option for China is messed up, remember they gave the justification of “it’s a military flag” while not re-adding the country flag and while germany’s WW2 “IMPERIAL WAR FLAG” still remains etc etc etc, as I said my guy, by criticizing X I’m not defending Y. Wrong is wrong committed either by X, Y, Z or the entire alphabet.
Edit, not adding the VT4 for Thailand under the japanese tech tree is also wrong ☺
1 Like