Dont look at his squadron lol
1 Like
Nah if you are unable to do so I’m gonna continue yapping about Pantsir
It’s edgy… but there is nothig political…
Dude, do an effort. The new AA are useless against the DIRCM helicopters with fire and forget missiles. The OG Pantsir is the best AA to counter them, even though Russia has the strongest heli of all nations thanks to the LMUR.
Japan and Israel have literally 0 AA that can counter the DIRCM helis. And Germany only has the Flakrad which is near useless against these helis.
And counter is a BIG word since a pilot with 2 braincell will immeditely dive down behind cover to avoid being hit.
Excuse me??? Nothing political? PLEASE elaborate on that.
I am just asking questions mate, but that is definitely political, cannot cheese your way out of that one.
What is the political part in it?
If we’re talking against choppers then I would disagree I genuinely do believe that adats is just better
We both know we can’t engage in that type of discussion because it will specifically land in political territory.
Don’t answer my question with another question, dodging what I asked. Please answer my question directly and I’ll repeat it again:
How is it not political?
You said it’s not and I’m asking you to elaborate.
the only true thing in the your reply
more SPAA, more and more, we need S300, T14, T15, OBJ195 etc…
And I don’t know why people are constantly saying that Russia has the best chopper with IR CCM like LMUR are hard to fight against but at least you’re fighting 8 of them unlike 16 spikes
1 Like
You claim it is political… you elaborate… I see only 3 letters representing army groups and the name of the russian spec ops… where is the political stuff?
Edit: btw “Spetnaz” is literally meaning “Spec Ops”
1 Like
And what problem with more AA yeah it’s for Russia but so what If anything I would say add more into other countries as well fuck CAS
??? This must be a joke right?
The Pantsir has more missiles, faster, that pull harder, and go further.
Its radar is so much better in tracking quality, refresh, and elevation covered.
Its guns are better.
It has better optics.(better thermal and zoom)
And it can automatically guide multiple missiles to shoot down bombs/missiles fired at it.
The ONLY thing the ADATS does better than the Pantsir is that it can somewhat kill vehicles with its missiles.
There, you answered the question. 3 letters representing “army groups” which we both know what they are and what they are doing and have been doing for the past 4 years and you have the balls to say it’s not political? Give me a break
It’s like saying putting “Z” over War Thunder tanks is not political because Z is just a letter of the alphabet.
This message will probably be deleted by moderation but it is what it is.
1 Like
I’ll change my nickname again soon and put one that will annoy them even more lol
1 Like
Well yeah of course but I was talking about irst track and with smokeless missiles it’s actually pretty good at least for me
Just asking questions, noticing things, you know. It’s just very strange, I am sure those letters don’t symbolize anything for a specific country that is currently engaged in a very specific type of action towards another specific country. I am also sure that said country isn’t using those letters as a political tool either.
Again, just noticing, asking about things. I am not accusing anyone of anything.