It’s gonna be fun bonking 8.7 tanks with this HE lol
I did the exact same thing with the Merk Mk.3s lmao. It’s so much easier to use than the HEAT-FS.
we should probably get back on topic before we all get pwned
The Level 24 T-55AM-1 player seeing a pixel of a Sabra
3 Likes
They did that last year. Iirc it showed up during the winter/new year sale instead.
Given no updates on the sabra Mk.1s development have been given and the update is drawing ever near, I decided to ping stona on the Sabra Mk.1 devblog.
1 Like
I wanted to share my two reports on the Sabra:
[DEV] Sabra Mk.I missing Laser Warning System
[DEV] Sabra Mk.I incorrect turret ammo rack position
(The one about the LWS was already done before, but I wanted to make another one to attract attention to this issue)
5 Likes
In all fairness, unless they make the rear turret ammo rack the second primary ammo storage instead of the third, it will barely change anything. Especially given the current second primary ammo rack is so large around the hull and easy to hit constantly and reliably. Until they finally fix that, it hardly changes anything other than being able to carry a few extra rounds.
As for the LWS, fingers crossed at least one report eventually gets acknowledged… can only hope they finally fix this and hopefully the Magach 7C by proxy. However given the rate things are going, I have a feeling nothing will change when it appears on the live server and we’ll have to remake all these bug report again. If worst comes to worse I can contact smin or a technical moderator to try to get them bumped and passed on.
(Really hoping we’ll get the LWS, as a LWS combined with the mainly anti chemical munition armor would make killing this thing with a heli near impossible. It even gets HETF rounds to deal with still flying helis more easily hehe)
Yes, I do think as well that it is very likely the Sabra will go to the live server in the state it is right now (I might be wrong, of course, there is still some time before the update goes live).
If things will still be incorrect by then we’ll remake the reports, as you suggested.
Good news.
It seems they changed the labels for reports, it is the first time I see “accepted”. It used to be “acknowledged”.
I think they simply replaced the tag “Acknowledged” to “Accepted” across the entire site
I believe this change happens awhile ago in tandem with the bug report managers names being hidden. Should have the same effect as acknowledged tho, I doubt there’s any change to it.
This is a little off topic, but I just remembered it when looking at this thread, but the Israeli Ra’am Sagol and Merkava Mk.3D’s hull ammo fill order doesn’t match any other Merkava in-game.
Has a bug report been made on this problem?
I do not believe so, and I hate making them. They always require you to play a game and do this and that.
Like, it’s pretty obvious from just screenshots that this isn’t correct, and they want me to fill out all these minor/irrelevant details.
It’s the same thing with bug reporting the Namer’s door or the Sho’t Kal Alef’s numerous texture bugs.
Since I’m busy with some other stuff, I’d appreciate if someone would go through that for me.
FCS still hasnt been uptaded.
@BasherBenDawg8 you might wanna make bug report for Turret traverse and gun elevation speed, i just checked the Dev Server and it seems nothing has been changed.
Not surprised. However I’m holding off until the update goes live before I dig into this and make a bug report, especially since I lack the exact sources which talk about the turret drive.
3 Likes
All you can do is fight like hell for it to get corrected.