It can if the material the projectile is made of is harder… try again. Low IQ. You disproved nothing.
So they are all lying in there documents then because it is impossible for a APFSDS to pen more then its length
Did they actually state this? Either way, I doubt it, it is probably balanced based. Otherwise a lot of tanks would have faster reload right now, like Type 10 with its 3.2?s reload, which would be mega aids to fight.
I suppose you have source?
I’ll ask the friend I got this from.
I’m not arguing the cone I’m arguing the laser not picking up targets on it’s own to que up by radar under automation.
Autoloaders are source based by they don’t really like emergency modes and such and there are averages
Forgot to add. (If so, minimally)
I like how you mock intelligence as if you didn’t just write an entire essay of completely false claims.
Type 10’s IRL reload is 3.2 iirc. The emergency mode is even faster.
There’s effective areas and some YT players that have played the MI-28NM talk about giving a 45 degree face to maximise LDIRCM effectiveness. This isn’t made up.
1 Like
Jefrey file get uncensored
1 Like
Pretty much yes lmao, but only on manufacturer claims.
However in documents they usually dont state 0 deg pen, as it is not tested. Instead, they state the penetration at the angle they used, which would not be inflated.
Even HEAT MP will go though 3 meters of concrete before detonating on the other side in game it get 3mm of penetration. Grossley miss represented ammo.
Reminds me of all the programmable ammo that doesn’t have IRST target tracking functions too.
They didnt outright state it, however the reasoning they gave in the post is based entirely on technical capabilities with no mention of game balance.
On top of that, if it was merely matter of balance, they couldve just bring the AZ autoloader on par with the chinese autoloaders and called it a day, or have BVM load 3BM60 in 6 seconds as well.
Thanks, because if im reading this correctly, Mi28NM shouldnt be able to counter IR missiles coming from its front (or at least the bottom half).
And I can tell you from my time playing SLM, that simply isnt the case lol.
And the system is also able to counter infinite number of missiles currently, so you cant even overwhelm it.
3 meters? I doubt that, its probably less. Either way, the game does not simulate this, as this poor 20 year old game engine is struggling enough as is. You see those penetration simulations on youtube? They take a double digit amount of hours to render. There’s a reason the damage models are ultra-simplified.
You failed to answer any correctly in the first place.
Star Streak will literally converge straight through enemy CAS with no collision bug and misaligned laser targeting system. Console auto aim assist helps it work correctly.
The thing is, IRIS-T SLM doesnt come in the frontal arc like this, It kinda comes “top down” and thus goes into LDIRCM coverage area.
Id actually like to test that then.
Except for DU it’s 20% better than it’s length.
I have not had this problem. Might not have gotten this bug yet.