Weapons configuration are part of the balancing feature of War Thunder, this has been told many times, ammunition is calculated in the same way for every nation, and most of the values you see in the internet are against raw steel armor with no composite, while in War Thunder I’m not aware of what material is used for the armor calculation; HSTV-L with 350 mm of penetration means top tier (highest battle rating) possible. What’s the correlation of the Falcon (a battle rating 8.3 vehicle) not using APDS and why Terminator is a reference (a battle rating 11.3 vehicle), unless you mean you’ll want a battle rating 9.7 Terminator, I’m not here to advocate for USSR dominance. LDIRCM works greaty for every helicopter that has it, Z-10ME taking the biggest advantage of this tool, Depleted Uranium ammo is not properly modelled, explosive reactive armor is partially or better saying half-baked.
You’ve got to be joking when ever I’ve played Russian top tier it feels like I’m cheating it’s so easy and holds your hand. You’re simply given tools that outmatch everything in a clutch fight. You can even be stupid and just hold W and do well.
You had the only medium range SPAA in the game for maybe 2-3 years? in the Pantsir. Kh38 were causing so much overpressure they could kill and MBT through an indestructible building while Hellfire can hit the tires on a SPAA and not even kill the exposed drivers or set it on fire? It goes on and on.
- False
- ?
- Someone else can answer the Apache question, but Western bombs do not have their ovp nerfed, they are the same as all other bombs. Bombs got a universal nerf a month or so back.
- (F-111 question) ???
- Apache radar does work???
- Hellfire overpressure is inconsistent because HEAT warheads do not have ovp as their primary mechanic, its not just a Hellfire thing.
- Western tanks do have spall liners, besides Chally missing some.
- Someone who knows more about STANAG can answer this.
- Wtf are you even on about now, AIM-9s have a great range increase from 9B to 9L.
- I would assume that has to do with how they are modelled.
- Torque converters are not modelled because Gaijin is lazy.
- Brimstone is missing FnF because it would be OP.
- HSTV-L ROF was corrected, its penetration is not increased due to balance.
- TOW-2B was nerfed for a reason, it was ridiculous on launch, and forgotten about when it was nerfed.
- Huh?
- You’re right, all 30mm and 35mm APHE should have their APHE removed ;)
- Source on that CT40?
- Not a western missile problem, it was a bug with all missiles.
- Mi-28NM actually has the worst deadzones of any LDIRCM heli.
- Huh?
- F-16 can carry 6 AIM-120s though???
- Works for me.
- False.
Stop making stuff seem like it only affects one side. Oh wait, you do that on purpose.
The sheer amount of bullsht in this reply is insane.
It is not inflated
Getting your points adressed properly is a privilege, not a right.
I wouldnt be saying this after being called out as a hypocrite but maybe thats just me.
“I can comment on vehicles I havent played but not the others!”
Get tf out lol.
The difference is that 2A7/122 can position and reverse to minimize hits on weak areas.
Thought it would be the best for both parties. People would hopefully complain less about T-80 reload buff.
Shoving words into other people’s mouths is something you did the first time I spoke to you, along with acting like a douche.
I have no respect for you and if that affects your argument and capability to respond then you’re frankly a toddler.
It is though? Its common knowledge if you do research on APFSDS rounds.
Its not
Are all Western APFSDS just inflated
We’re simply not living in the same reality if you can’t concede these things.
They’re all reasons I haven’t paid premium subscription for 4 years running as 13 to soon 14 year player.
Im perfectly fine with that lol.
Their 0 degree numbers are, and it goes for all APFSDS, not just Western. In game there isn’t inflation, this is about IRL claims.
Yeah i was talking about IRL
They are not “inflated”
You hoped I wouldn’t call out your ridiculous claims and get put off by the text wall huh?
Then give an opinion and a point. We’re all looking for others’ answers and opinions here apart from you.
They are though? The penetration cannot exceed the penetrator length, and it is common knowledge that testing is done at X angle and then put through a formula to get the 0 deg equivalent of the penetration at that angle. That 0 deg “equivalent” is then used, even though it is technically false.
It is hands down the best tank in the game now.
MBTs wipe the floor with BMPT if you know how to kill it.
LDIRCM has deadzones? As far as Im aware thats not the case with its current implementation, neither is limit on missiles it can “counter” at once.
fair enough.
shrug. I suppose in ideal world I could see that, but gaijin very clearly made its position clear within the last autoloader changes devblog; with loading times for hand loading being balancing factor and autoloaders being historical.
so we have to work with that.
