Russian top tier tanks need a fair buff

It is not inflated

1 Like

Getting your points adressed properly is a privilege, not a right.

I wouldnt be saying this after being called out as a hypocrite but maybe thats just me.

“I can comment on vehicles I havent played but not the others!”

Get tf out lol.

2 Likes

The difference is that 2A7/122 can position and reverse to minimize hits on weak areas.

Thought it would be the best for both parties. People would hopefully complain less about T-80 reload buff.

It is though? Its common knowledge if you do research on APFSDS rounds.

Its not

Are all Western APFSDS just inflated

We’re simply not living in the same reality if you can’t concede these things.
They’re all reasons I haven’t paid premium subscription for 4 years running as 13 to soon 14 year player.

Im perfectly fine with that lol.

2 Likes

Their 0 degree numbers are, and it goes for all APFSDS, not just Western. In game there isn’t inflation, this is about IRL claims.

Yeah i was talking about IRL

They are not “inflated”

You hoped I wouldn’t call out your ridiculous claims and get put off by the text wall huh?

1 Like

Then give an opinion and a point. We’re all looking for others’ answers and opinions here apart from you.

They are though? The penetration cannot exceed the penetrator length, and it is common knowledge that testing is done at X angle and then put through a formula to get the 0 deg equivalent of the penetration at that angle. That 0 deg “equivalent” is then used, even though it is technically false.

It is hands down the best tank in the game now.

MBTs wipe the floor with BMPT if you know how to kill it.

2 Likes

LDIRCM has deadzones? As far as Im aware thats not the case with its current implementation, neither is limit on missiles it can “counter” at once.

fair enough.

shrug. I suppose in ideal world I could see that, but gaijin very clearly made its position clear within the last autoloader changes devblog; with loading times for hand loading being balancing factor and autoloaders being historical.

so we have to work with that.

1 Like

1 Like

It can if the material the projectile is made of is harder… try again. Low IQ. You disproved nothing.

So they are all lying in there documents then because it is impossible for a APFSDS to pen more then its length

Did they actually state this? Either way, I doubt it, it is probably balanced based. Otherwise a lot of tanks would have faster reload right now, like Type 10 with its 3.2?s reload, which would be mega aids to fight.

I suppose you have source?