I ommited SPIKE and PARS because the argument is the same without them.
Anyway.
Your focus was on things being made up and on those made up things being almost exclusively Soviet/Russian. I just pointed out that US/German/Israeli/French (let’s bring in the Akeron too) also have lofting trajectories that are made up. Why do you have an issue with that?
I’ve read it here in the forums, in theory a stabilizer was developed, but never properly built or tested.
I’m sorry if I’m being lazy as hell, but I’ll check if I could find the thread and the exact quote later.
Because the LMUR one is not made up. It’s the only correctly lofting agm as per the sources. All the other ones are being left in non or very low lofting states despite ample sources and even accepted bug reports that are, in pars case, 6 years old.
Oh, so the LMUR is the only one out of those missiles that doesn’t actually have made up characteristics?
Precisely, it’s the only one that’s correct
The others being made up to be worse is not the gotcha you think it is
All the new SPAAs are complete garbage, and they can’t hit any plane simply because it’s flying close to the ground. The most ridiculous one is BUK, a giant, enormous thing just standing still in the respawn area waiting to be hit or destroyed by a shot from the other side of the map because the maps are the size of my neighborhood. BVVD is crazy, he’s not himself, he doesn’t think straight, and the map designers at Gaijin should be subjected to medieval torture methods. After saying all that, I’m going to have a coffee. Have a good day.
I’m just trying to find the systemic soviet/russian bias you gesture vaguely towards but all I see is inconsistent modelling?
Inconsistent modeling lol. They actively ignore 6 year old bug reports but LMUR gets correct loft day one, it’s literally just one line of code. The bmpt is the same, weird that the inconsistent modeling just benefits russia, hm? Also very convenient that you rusbots never know anything about naval and air so you just can’t say anything about that
no, new 2S25M can be equipped with UTD-32 with a capacity of 600 hsp
and it also has LWS
Thanks for calling me a bot, appreciated, anyway, I don’t feel comfortable speaking about air because i don’t know enough about it. It’s called restraint, you should try using it instead of coping about russian bias.
I don’t know anything about naval because it’s the most boring and useless addition to the game and I wish i could uninstall that part of the game so it wouldn’t take up my disc space.
Do you remember how the exhaust blocked the thermals on the BMP-2M until Merkavas got added?
Do you remember how the Soviet autoloaders were artificially nerfed until recently?
It’s called convenient since it always means that you guys can perfectly choose the arguments you want to engage with. Really nicely halfs the valid examples for you so there’s 0 reason to broaden one’s knowledge or read into things.
No I don’t remember some random ass bug from forever ago which is nowhere near the same as actively programming fakes.
You mean the thing Gaijin fixed instantly to best possible values once there were proper sources available without any BR changes while everyone else is stuck with non optimal reload rates for balance purposes?
Getting called out for trying not to talk about stuff I know nothing about sure is an experience. Please consider buying a one way ticket to Switzerland/Canada, depending on your continent of residence.
It’s not a random ass bug, it was confirmed multiple times that they weren’t planning on doing anything about it. That is until Israeli Merkavas came out. Maybe it’s Mossad secretly running Gaijin, who knows.
You mean the values that got changed after 8 years of being wrong and still aren’t close to the best case scenario (which is around 4s btw) so everybody is stuck with non optimal reload rates for balance purposes?
If you were truly advocating for realistic reloads you’d be advocating for 20+s reloads when moving and reload resetting upon hard impacts on manually loaded tanks. The 5s reload while falling off a cliff at 70kph is the most unrealistic reload related thing currently in game.
Ofc you are, because conveniently that’s all of you. Half knowledge but talking like the big Bois.
Ok let me spell it out for you. Bmpt belt modeled as 2, more work than one. Kh38mt added instead of just not, more work for gaijin. LMUR lofting correct compared to just copy and pasting the values from pars and spike that came before, more work for the devs.
This is not Gaijin being classically lazy, this is actively putting in work to make russia artificially better.
Fat lol for the 4 secs. It literally got changed install once a proper sources were there. Everyone else is sitting at what their are partially despite proper sources.
I’m not, you’re once again making things up in your head. Just complaining about that change from the profiting side is conpletely ridiculous
What?
Why would someone get bogged down in a discussion on a topic they don’t know anything about?
Lacking in-game knowledge on something isn’t “convenient”. It’s called “fact”.
I’d like you to read this where Stona states that Gaijin has been aware of these cyclograms for a long time.
You’re talking about how some things are made up and unrealistic yet when I bring up unrealistic reload times while we’re discussing unrealistic reload times I’m somehow making things up in my head?
Can we please not “play” sides? Or at least until the GRU starts paying me, I’m not gonna do this for free… (Saab and other manufacturers are also welcome, please contact me via my email.)
This one thought is especially jupiterean, who would’ve thought that working on new content requires work
I think I should be able to defend myself when accused of being biased
You take it to Dm’s and not add to the drama on the public forum.
this is not unique to BUK. at least that ones missile trucks can operate autonomously.
Ever having faith in Gaijin is a blunder.
bruh
theres a few members of this forum who should be prime hires for WT, saw one guy that redid the xray of panthers to be much better. Theres actual talent that could make things much better.
I agree that there shouldn’t be things unrelated to the topic here, I also think that questioning one’s biases is inappropriate and I should try to disprove that, preferably with data and not vibes
