KH-38MT Seeker does exist, and the missile itself does as well, they just haven’t been mounted together as far as we know.
1 Like
Opposed to the lofting trajectories of the PARS, JAGM and SPIKE which are also made up by Gaijin?
I thought we both agreed that the other vehicles with similar belts need to be buffed and be made more like the BMPT, meaning that the Marder belt is the one that’s actually made up?
1 Like
Uhm yeah because there’s a metric ton of sources that the angle in which the loft are not what they do irl. Videos, written statements, brochures, the whole Shabang. The LMUR literally has the flimsiest sources when it comes to lofting.
We don’t. I just said that it’s nice that you acknowledge that the bmpt gets preferential treatment. I think it’s absolute fine that the Marder gets wrecked but I’m not fine with the blatant double standard. Also even if 30mms don’t often chain detonate, it’s very convenient that the BMPTs belt changes exactly at the point where it would become problematic for the vehicle
there’s NO WAY a testbed without stabilizer will be a good option at top tier.
There’s literally a stabilized 152mm powerhouse at 10.7, using the same arguments everyone here use to downplay the T-series tanks, claiming that it is already DOA ends up being absolutely valid.
Okay so, tried to look for a report about JAGM being wrong, found one. So it the report is correct (passed to developers atm), the current JAGM lofting is made up.
On the other hand, the LMUR lofting seems to also be made up.
Why do you have an issue with them being made up instead of balancing them better by making the lofting performance match better
1 Like
The LMUR one is fine the JAGM one is wrong compared to irl (also very funny that you just straight up ignore pars and spike)
Don’t you understand that making something up for a positive and keeping something negative made up despite ample evidence is different?
Out of curiousity, do you have a source for the CATTB not having a stabilizer?
I can’t find a lot of documents/papers on the CATTB so I would love to read up on it more.
I ommited SPIKE and PARS because the argument is the same without them.
Anyway.
Your focus was on things being made up and on those made up things being almost exclusively Soviet/Russian. I just pointed out that US/German/Israeli/French (let’s bring in the Akeron too) also have lofting trajectories that are made up. Why do you have an issue with that?
1 Like
I’ve read it here in the forums, in theory a stabilizer was developed, but never properly built or tested.
I’m sorry if I’m being lazy as hell, but I’ll check if I could find the thread and the exact quote later.
1 Like
Because the LMUR one is not made up. It’s the only correctly lofting agm as per the sources. All the other ones are being left in non or very low lofting states despite ample sources and even accepted bug reports that are, in pars case, 6 years old.
Oh, so the LMUR is the only one out of those missiles that doesn’t actually have made up characteristics?
Precisely, it’s the only one that’s correct
The others being made up to be worse is not the gotcha you think it is
All the new SPAAs are complete garbage, and they can’t hit any plane simply because it’s flying close to the ground. The most ridiculous one is BUK, a giant, enormous thing just standing still in the respawn area waiting to be hit or destroyed by a shot from the other side of the map because the maps are the size of my neighborhood. BVVD is crazy, he’s not himself, he doesn’t think straight, and the map designers at Gaijin should be subjected to medieval torture methods. After saying all that, I’m going to have a coffee. Have a good day.
I’m just trying to find the systemic soviet/russian bias you gesture vaguely towards but all I see is inconsistent modelling?
Inconsistent modeling lol. They actively ignore 6 year old bug reports but LMUR gets correct loft day one, it’s literally just one line of code. The bmpt is the same, weird that the inconsistent modeling just benefits russia, hm? Also very convenient that you rusbots never know anything about naval and air so you just can’t say anything about that
no, new 2S25M can be equipped with UTD-32 with a capacity of 600 hsp
Spoiler
and it also has LWS
Thanks for calling me a bot, appreciated, anyway, I don’t feel comfortable speaking about air because i don’t know enough about it. It’s called restraint, you should try using it instead of coping about russian bias.
I don’t know anything about naval because it’s the most boring and useless addition to the game and I wish i could uninstall that part of the game so it wouldn’t take up my disc space.
Do you remember how the exhaust blocked the thermals on the BMP-2M until Merkavas got added?
Do you remember how the Soviet autoloaders were artificially nerfed until recently?
It’s called convenient since it always means that you guys can perfectly choose the arguments you want to engage with. Really nicely halfs the valid examples for you so there’s 0 reason to broaden one’s knowledge or read into things.
No I don’t remember some random ass bug from forever ago which is nowhere near the same as actively programming fakes.
You mean the thing Gaijin fixed instantly to best possible values once there were proper sources available without any BR changes while everyone else is stuck with non optimal reload rates for balance purposes?
2 Likes
Getting called out for trying not to talk about stuff I know nothing about sure is an experience. Please consider buying a one way ticket to Switzerland/Canada, depending on your continent of residence.
It’s not a random ass bug, it was confirmed multiple times that they weren’t planning on doing anything about it. That is until Israeli Merkavas came out. Maybe it’s Mossad secretly running Gaijin, who knows.
You mean the values that got changed after 8 years of being wrong and still aren’t close to the best case scenario (which is around 4s btw) so everybody is stuck with non optimal reload rates for balance purposes?
If you were truly advocating for realistic reloads you’d be advocating for 20+s reloads when moving and reload resetting upon hard impacts on manually loaded tanks. The 5s reload while falling off a cliff at 70kph is the most unrealistic reload related thing currently in game.
1 Like
Ofc you are, because conveniently that’s all of you. Half knowledge but talking like the big Bois.
Ok let me spell it out for you. Bmpt belt modeled as 2, more work than one. Kh38mt added instead of just not, more work for gaijin. LMUR lofting correct compared to just copy and pasting the values from pars and spike that came before, more work for the devs.
This is not Gaijin being classically lazy, this is actively putting in work to make russia artificially better.
Fat lol for the 4 secs. It literally got changed install once a proper sources were there. Everyone else is sitting at what their are partially despite proper sources.
I’m not, you’re once again making things up in your head. Just complaining about that change from the profiting side is conpletely ridiculous