Your correct they don’t match irl reloads, in game the manual loaded tanks load faster than the irl tank they portray.
If we are going that far, there’s a lot of other variables to consider, but rather than make annoying mechanics, they could just give things like the abrams a 5.5 sec load time aced, the T-80Us their 6.0 sec load time, then everyone is happy.
what are you on?
abrams expert crew should be around 5 seconds and ace even faster
also T80 will not be able to reload a second APFSDS that quickly because they can not be loaded next to each other
You are correct, apparently the title page didn’t upload, not sure why. But I just saw a bunch of other similar posts that all get labeled “not a bug” but have the same info. You cannot tell me gaijin is not artificially nerfing Russian vehicles
it would take around 9-12 sec and fixing it take at least 20 sec, but its depend of the crew points and ace/repair
Go look at previous videos I posted, all randomly picked. None go faster than 6.06 secs
SUPER INCORRECT. T-80BVM is the only one that has that issue, when only using 3BM60
In game right now, I believe with an expert crew it’s 32 secs to repair the autoloader.
you mean giving Mi28 twice as many LMURs as there is evidence that it can carry is an artificial nerf?
or how about its single DIRCM turret on the bottom of the airframe being able to dazzle multiple missiles above it?
or what about any plane in game getting KH-38MT despite no evidence any of them can carry it or it existing?
or maybe the current implementation of ERA that heavily benefits russian and chinese tanks?
and ive seen videos for sub 4 second, and given ace crew is supposed to represent the best possible crew it should get a reload closer to that number than average
You literally have provided no evidence to those claims.
Care to explain why the soviets aren’t the First Nation with ERA in warthunder? Despite inventing it, and being the first to deploy it?
Post said video then. Once again, you have provided 0 evidence
you guys are arguring about the wrong thing, russia is suffering a lot in light tanks missing / 12.7 with r60m against f18a / f18 spam in sim / fighter missing from 10.0 to 12.7 / APC missing
There’s a lot of BTRs they could add. Simple stabilized BTR-80s
Or the BMP-2M turret’d BTR-80
Etc
wtf are you on, all of those are simple facts and unless you have counter sources, show an insane amount of favoritism to certain vehicles
its pretty simple, they didnt, it was proposed and tested during WW2 by Australians
I have yet to see chinese mbts being comparable to russian ones in terms of armour by heavily benefitting from current ERA implementation, especially considering they are still missing stuff like spall liners
they definitely dont benefit as much as russian tanks, but they do benefit, it for example it slightly reduces the hitbox of the LFP because if you even clip the backing plate of the first ERA blocks gaijin treats the round as having to go through the whole block, not just a tiny edge of the backing plate
Honestly, I think the main issue should be something else. A good starting point would be to increase the size of the maps and decompress the BRs, regardless of whether helicopters are strong right now or not. There will come a point where the main nations will become nearly impossible to play against because everyone will have ridiculous weapons, especially for CAS.
If things are already absurd with regular fire-and-forget missiles, just imagine when anti-radiation missiles arrive. In ARB, weapons like the Meteor (I’m not sure of the exact designation, so I’m using it as an example) will only make things worse.
The trend is clear — it’s only going to get worse. Russia is extremely strong right now simply because they’re the first nation getting these kinds of systems. But if they expanded the maps and improved the BR system, they could remove many of the unnecessary nerfs affecting probably every nation.
One artificial nerf I always mention is the AIM-120, which currently feels like an AIM-7F with more Gs of maneuvering. If you fire it from more than 5–6 km away, you have to keep the radar locked the whole time, otherwise it gets spoofed by just a few chaffs — it’s a ridiculous nerf.
Genuinely what kind of proof do you want here? We know where the LDIRCM is located on the MI28, weve seen the documentation of only 4 LMURs and weve yet to see any evidence whatsoever about the KH38MT being mounted on the planes we have in game
*evidence whatsoever about the KH38MT being mounted on planes
True, i wanted to be nice and make the burden of proof a bit lower.