Pretty much all but the 9m317MA has been known to exist, KH-38MT has seen extremely little use in a current conflict, but yeah LMUR has been rather abundant
9m317a is know to exist, not ma. Compelete different missile
I think it’s probably been trialed but not in service
I did make a bug report. I’ll link it for you.
https://community.gaijin.net/issues/p/warthunder/i/N3mqCADyDKuZ
It was closed almost instantly. Seems like even though the documents are true, gaijin won’t give the MZ loader its true reload speed.
Sounds like a double standard eh?
1 Like
Longer than that, pretty sure the T series auto loader was modeled a full year before turret baskets came about
1 Like
For KH-38MT news sources in Ukraine we’re confirming its use, again, was very limited use though.
1 Like
lmao, you found sources so bad they didnt even work to buff a t80
it is not
38ML is but 38MT absolutely does not
2 Likes
I forgot how bad the br gap is for the Tu-4 vs the B-29 I can understand a 0.3 br difference. 1.0 br difference is a bit much.
Primary source on a 3rd party website is bad now? When on several sites it confirms the same data?
I’ll remember when you next poor argument comes up.
Gaijin won’t buff it because it will start another fire storm of “Russian bias” claims, because USA mains are bad at the game
1 Like
how
one has 12.7mm machine guns
the other has 23mm cannons
they both suck currently but the difference absolutely makes sense
Look it up bud. Ground news even had it
Not a 1.0 difference. That’s too much.
They share all the same characteristics bar the defense machine guns.
That’s why the TU-4 should be 7.3 and the B29 7.0
to be honest, all tank who use human reload should get a bar of fatigue where if you shoot 4 round it would increase reload by 15% and a other 30% after 8 round, until 10 round are shoot and it become a 9 sec reload. same with auto reload, need to take a lot of time to change from apfsds to heat or he, but also manual reload of t series. and also the round is in the canon then someone shoot autoloader but i cant fire is annoying
not how it works
without actual title page the “primary source” is worthless because there is no proof that it isnt edited or fake
so your source actualy is a blog post full of errors (I saw multiple in less than a minute of looking)
it depends on the tank, but on modern ones it should be more than 4
the position of the ready rack compared to the breach makes loading much less tiring than people think because its more of a process of controlling how the round falls than carrying it
also if they do this they should increase the loading speed of manual loaders, particularly for expert and ace crews because the current reload rates do not match IRL on many tanks
yeah i just gave a exemple, its okay if they keep it that way, i am just asking for manual reload of the t series, i found this that shows only the t72 and t90 autoloader but i dont know about the t80 one
tbf the one which would work with the autoloader broken probably would take almost as long as fixing the autoloader in game takes
and might not be possible with in game ammo loads because people normally dont have any ammo outside of the carousel
are you blind? because that was not in the bug report that you posted
Your correct they don’t match irl reloads, in game the manual loaded tanks load faster than the irl tank they portray.
If we are going that far, there’s a lot of other variables to consider, but rather than make annoying mechanics, they could just give things like the abrams a 5.5 sec load time aced, the T-80Us their 6.0 sec load time, then everyone is happy.