It really doesn’t
So if you check every thread about “Russian bias”/“Russia steamrolling NATO”/“Nato underpowered copared to Russia”, I would not find your posts?
1 Like
If I was getting carried by my friends I wouldn’t be sitting at a 2.9 K/D in my SEPv3.
Yeah they have aome BS moments, but overall T-90M and T-80BVM are just so farmable.
Like I said, keep blaming everything around you for your issues, will keep you at your current skill level.
2 Likes
I think that since patch the matches last a lot longer in average than before. Steamrolls mostly happen, if half your team decides to spawn only 1 time and leaves after 4 minutes, which can’t be carried, not even by ultra bias.
I least like beeing matched with Germany, they will never learn i guess.
3 Likes
Except for the first 9 months of 2025 where Germany had a better winrate than the US and the highest major winrate in February, March, June, July and August? Must be a really recent learning disability affecting the Germany playerbase then.
Which is why I play all nations, right ?
BMPTs are so January 2026.
1 Like
This post was flagged by the community and is temporarily hidden.
2 Likes
Anyone knows why TUSK modification on the SEP v2 is unlocked by default? Even if you’re entirely stock?
(Yes, I know, not stock any more in the picture but I’d taken the pic after my first match, which only allowed me to research the Parts and FPE, not the TUSK module).
They add option to remove tusk not that long ago and forget to make it researchable.
1 Like
So if the West isn’t superior in military technology, why are they stuck with ammo that’s almost three decades old while a certain nation gets its most modern ammo and weaponry?
Then can i get Obj 195 with intergrated radar and 30mm coax ? Its from 2000x definitely not modern.
Oreshnik for 956 sp
That is modern and as we heard we can’t have modern stuff its bias
Thanks for proving my point lmao
Prooving what ? Your point has nothing to do with discussion. And game balance doesn’t go on age of equipment and if age was relevant i would see IS-3 on 6.3 and T-54 on 6.7.
So you admit nato is superior.
No.
Then why is it unbalanced? You are contradicting yourself here.
Just out of question how do you explain things as not being biased towards Russia?
Like how do you explain things like the KH-38MT(A missile so lacking in information the debate about it isn’t even what it can do, but if it even exists) which is one-sidedly the best ATGM in the game and was added in a time when nobody could start to counter it?
How do you explain things like the Pantsir being added in the same update as a major nerf to the ADATS and other western systems causing a complete lopsided dominance of the air when it came out?
The fact most additions to the game aren’t added until Russia can be given it and often times they are given it first for example spall liners which Nato tanks that had been in the game for years never got, until Russia was given an MBT with them, and even then it took a while for other tanks to get spall liners.
What’s the explanation as to why they still haven’t received as many internal components and why the Autoloader Carousel doesn’t stop the T-series tanks from aiming while NATO tank turret baskets do even though A damaged turret basket wouldn’t cause the effects in game, or the fact that for the longest time and this might still be the case the Powder charges that stand upright in the carousel of the T-series tanks don’t explode when hit despite being the most explosive prone thing in the tank.
The fact Russian tanks are extremely well modeled and get fixes to the models quickly, yet its been like eight years and we still don’t even have the proper fuel tank bulkheads on the Abrams a bug report that has been accepted for like two years at this point.
Why are Russian ATGMS and other missiles allowed the ability to overpressure enemy vehicles but NATO warheads with as large or larger HEAT heads can’t even though they are high explosive and at the payload hitting the tank would cause an overpressure to the crew?
Why was the LMUR the only ATGM in the game to receive proper Lofting and still is the only one to have a proper loft angle, despite other vehicles having spikes, hellfires, and whatever the chinese thing is for year predating the LMUR and on that note why did they nerf the armor values without a source provided on the LEO2A7 and Merkava so that a LMUR could cause overpressure on the tanks.
And are you really going to say that there has never been any bias towards Russia in the game, when the entire Bug Report forum had to be reorganized and changed because of the actions of the moderators in dealing with reports regarding NATO and Russian tanks?
Last one Russian top tier naval, which is literally all made up stuff that isn’t even slightly accurate to the tiny documentation known about it, and is game breaking to top tier naval (which is even better when you consider they couldn’t be bothered to model a single one of the other countries top tier naval ships correctly lmao)
Yes there are standout examples of other nations getting things here and there that were broken, but most of them were fixed extremely quickly and placed in appropriate BR’s, and secondly the list of like all the broken things combined from other nations is shorter than Russia’s list.
9 Likes
Yeah yeah “skill issue” lmao. Weakest argument ever, but I understand it’s all a 100 iq can muster. Gonna put you on ignore too since you bring nothing of value to the discussion.