yeah
Do these systems have minimum engagement ranges, that would be a good way to stop jets just firing these and over HARMs off at near point blank ranges decimating SAMS
1 Like
and it is objectively similar
you know given that it is very closely comparable unlike many of the other ARMs added
i am not sure, you can ask ron in the flanker forum. he got the brochure for them
1 Like
drag wont change anything
It has a ramjet engine sustainer. It will keep that high speed and because it lofts a fair bit it wont be affected by drag much.
Not only does it get advantage of loft for lower drag but it is also flying well above the radar ceiling of a lot of SPAAs.
So adding drag will change nothing. You simply cannot balance a highly supersonic missile with ramjet when you compare it to solid booster HARMs or ALARM, and im not even going to bother mentioning the french ARM that is slow as hell
All u need for T-series is 1 non pen (which they get A LOT) and it’s over for you. Abrams is unlimited as long as you play like a scalded cat!
Or it’s unlimted when you don’t suffer from a skill issue.
Try it sometimes.
1 Like
got a 15km kill in arb with the kh38mt on a grippy, and it wasnt a meme lucky kill. the kh38mt is genuinely effective in some circumstance against aircraft
most f15es use the better engines
the dogma of the kh38mt defender, the brochure simultaneusly proves it exist but cannot be used to nerf it cause its not the same missile(said by real people on reddit btw)
1 Like
So by this logic, they need to remove the Kh31PD and never add the Meteor, because it also has ramjet and will be faster then everything else?
Multiple systems refer to multi vehicle spaa
Drag low down which is where players are using it would reduce it somewhat and speculative 40km shots the missiles are arriving at mach 3.5 - 4.0
1 Like
yes?
uh, yes? If no other nation is going to receive next gen Fox 3s then i think its completely logical Meteor should never be added.
If other nations get comparable missiles then an argument can be made.
Youre not very good at following simple lines are you.
Again, if every other nation had comparable ARM, meaning there would be no large (a massive emphasis on large) enough difference in performance between them then the argument for keeping Kh31PD could be made.
However currently they are just massively overperforming compared to every other ARM.
It is quite literally the exact same situation as mavericks vs kh38s, with the only difference that unlike mavericks HARMs are atleast somewhat solid and reliable.
Important part:
Personally i would say that Ramjet assisted ARHs (and ARMs for that matter) should never be added for the sake of balance. Because of how meteors work by extending the no-escape zone massively it is my opinion that they would simply be unbelievably broken in the current iteration of top tier ARB, especially since they can be fielded in large numbers.
And with Kh31PDs it is just plain to see how much they over perform over others by the sheer virtue of speed
Just as an example, ive played some games yesterday in my MKM while grinding for the Leopard 2RI:
Spoiler
It was not very fair.
1 Like
You should take your own advice. You like to feign a superiority complex to try to make yourself look better and feel better, but you’re Just another self proclaimed king of the forums. You like to brag, and stir the pot but I only see you with like a .5kdr
There are a lot of people who are better than me at this game, both on and off this forum. Hell I’m good friends with someone who would absolutely destroy me in any fight in this game.
difference between you and me seems to be that I accept this fact while you seem to be using all kinds of excuses to deny it (russian bias, nato suffers etc.).
I would love to see those .5 K/Ds in my recently played vehicles that you claim I have.
3 Likes
It’s always easier to blame everything else for your failures. Human nature though.
5 Likes
Ah, I get it now. You’re friends carry you. Cool. Dude, stop trolling to try to get the thread locked. There is russian bias. It’s undeniable. I prefer to play russia as a nation and I’ll say it! When I use my m1a2 trophy and do a perfect 90deg side shot to a t90m 100 yards away and relikt absorbs the A3…thats bs. When t90m and bvm treads absorb A3 thats bs. When I do a center frontal lfp shot to a bvm and hit nothing but the engine…that’s bs. Why are lmur and kh’s about 85% kill while agm’s are about 40%? For “balance” reasons why does the t90 M-A get 11 aps rounds and the t72b3a get 12…while the a2trophy gets 6 and black knight gets 4?..yeah, yeah “realism”…right! Respond all you want, but I’m gonna put you on ignore so I don’t have to read your garbage cope for russia.
Only ones that fail are those like you who go above and beyond to cover for an obvious bias. You just want your easy mode and frankly playing russia get kinda boring at top tier. The WORST players in the entire game, in my opinion, also are playing russia. If they can’t hold W and roll to victory half the team quits after 1 death. Deny all you want you guys are killing the game. I play ALL the nations and just want a fair and balanced game…you guys just want more bmpt…boring to anyone with any maturity.
1 Like
You do know that this goes both ways, right?
1 Like