https://youtu.be/zWeqkxWgDRo my top tier experience 3 people could not kill me
the guy in the t95 lol
Shooting the breech does nothing a majority of the times, no ones aiming at the top of the turret. or the sides of the UFP, only thing people will fire at is the bottom or the drivers port.
1 Like
having to shoot the auto loader 2 - 3 times to blo up a russian tank is great! I fired 2/3 adats misiles into the side of a BVM and was firing all the apds rounds at it, and it just turned to shoot me as it was camping the spawn.
Either this thread remains clean and respectful or it will be taken down. Your choice.
so soviet tanks are the best armored vehicles in the game.
I can agree with that to a certain extent. But they’re definitely not the best looking. And that’s what matters most. (Only victim to power creeping meta can think otherwise).
Yes it does
I kill them all the time through the roof when they are staying hull down.
3 Likes
he plays arcade games hahahahahahahahahahaha
1 Like
Most of the weights of Russian tanks in this game are the strongest, and if you have any questions about this, it’s obvious that you haven’t played tanks from other countries
Thats exactly sum a noob wallet warrior would say lmao, russian toptier tanks are really good and survivable, sounds like ur having a massive skill issue mate, womp womp womp
4 Likes
Heh impressive
RU main never stop surprise me.
They are bad? Nah they’re on par with Leopard 2A7 and Strv122
1 Like
This kinda sounds like reflection, not gonna lie.
It’s each and every single Abrams-related thread that is brigaded and bombarded by RU/CN mains, disregarding any form of legitimate concerns with “hurr durr noob us main skill issue US aktchually OP” and often going as far with personal quarrels as requiring the moderators to step in, issue bans, clean up and lock the threads.
Now we get yet another thread saying that Russia suffers and somehow some users still managed to flip the tables once again and make it about demonizing “America mains”… literally the first reply on this very thread is to bash “American mains” instead of actually addressing the topic’s subject matter.
Constantly antagonise and demonise “U.S mains”, and when they fall and give in to the provocations to “fight back”, play the victim. That’s not nice…
8 Likes
It has a reason lol because most threads like these were started by USA mains who then start making a bunch of nonsense claims like this invincible, that invincible, or start making ridiculous suggestions like vehicle x that they never played somehow justified to go to 11.3 or 11.7, when record says it is struggle in 10.7, if anything they are just inviting these kind of response from people who actually played them lol
1 Like
For every nonsensical thread there were (“Muh M1A2 has no DU ingame, look X-Ray, it should be 1,200mm KE on the hull”, etc), there were others perfectly reasonable and legitimate; speaking of the general performance (which is objectively NOT just a “skill issue” matter) and issues such as the mismodelled turret ring, fuel tank bulkheads geometries, and even the possibility of the tank having some form of spall protection.
Yet all of these were brigaded into being locked in the same fashion; both the nonsensical ones and the perfectly reasonable ones.
Of course this ends up generating backlash…
I wish people could just live and let live, but I’m delusional to wish it could ever be like that. Some people like too much to hate others to let go of the pleasure it gives them to attack and insult them, even if it has to be over some inocuous videogame thing.
5 Likes
Russian tanks are defenitely not bad, but if you think they are on par with 2A7 or Strv you are absolutely delusional.
6 Likes
You’re out of your mind. You must be having a laugh.
Some of you insist that Russian tanks are equal to the 2A7s/122s.
Some of you insist that Abrams tanks are equal to the 2A7s/122s.
The only truth is- asymetrically, Russian tanks and Abrams tanks are asymmetrucally equal; and both of them, inferior to the 2A7s/122s.
-Abrams: high floor (bad), but high ceiling (good). They have strengths and weaknesses.
In short: harder to do well with for the average player, but easier to do extraordinarily well with for the better player.
-Russia: low floor (good), but low ceiling (bad). They have strengths and weaknesses.
In short: more easy to do well with for the average player, but harder to do extraordinarily well with for the better player.
-2A7/122: low floor (good), AND high ceiling (good). They only have strengths, and no weaknesses at all.
In short: more easy to do well with for the average player, AND easier to do extraordinarily well with for the better player.
3 Likes
It’ll be nice to get some of those 2023 modifications with ERA on the lower plate.
1 Like
Mirage and I were speaking and in agreement on most things in our discussion, so he was accusing Mirage as well.
This is why I oppose Mirage’s style of marking weakspots. They mark strong points of armor, and pick & choose which strong points to mark to begin with.
Not really. BVM/ZTZ-99A aren’t the most armored, they’re just more armored than your images portray.