The issue I see with Russian SPAA is that the Pantsir should have never been added. Gaijin themselves said they cant find any other SPAA that exists comparable to it in the real world, and knew that it is far more capable than any other SPAA; they knew, yet they added it anyway because the “Tunguska wasn’t preforming well enough”
The reason the Tunguska wasn’t preforming well enough was because people didn’t spawn in it, because they had heaps of aircraft that were far more capable to use, like the KA50 that is arguably better at AA than most SPAA too, or was at the time, and aircraft that could nuke tanks from orbit with KH-23’s. its not that the Tunguska was under preforming at all, its just that there were better choices.
So Gaijin added the Pantsir. Controversial at the time, and still controversial now, considering it out preforms all other SPAA in the game in both range and abilities. Again, Gaijin knew they couldn’t find anything to compare it to outside of Russia, but added it anyway and now other nations have nothing that is even remotely comparable to it, and its too late to just remove it.
No other SPAA works on the near undetectable K band radar, no other SPAA has 20km range, no other SPAA has predictive tracking ((except the TOR-M1 which is also Russian technically)) and thus, it shouldn’t have been added in the first place because its clearly unbalanced. but Gaijin didn’t care, and still don’t care. You get next to no reward for shooting down aircraft using SPAA, and the only team with great SPAA also have SOME of the best CAS jets in the game, while every other nation is left to suffer.
Yes I think Gaijin did this out of a clear bias towards the Russian team, because there’s no real other answer until someone can explain to me why it is better in every single aspect by a vast margin than any other SPAA in the game.
I understand Russian doctrine is different IRL, and I understand that the capabilities of it are correct, but if you are going to add something that is completely overpowered to a GAME, then you need to consider if it is the right choice; and if you add it despite knowing its overpowered compared to everything else, then that shows a level of clear bias or ignorance towards the complaints or concerns of the playerbase.
The Tunguska was doing great. It was AS good as the ADATS when it came to shooting down aircraft, and the Pantsir wasnt needed.
A Rant from a long time veteran of War Thunder, and ground vehicle combat tester who has been seeing this for far too long.
Just to clarify, I’m a ground user and hate aircraft, but if things are going to be balanced, everyone should be either as good at shooting the aircraft down, or just as bad at shooting them down. not one nation being at a huge advantage over the others. that’s called “Balance”