You’re the one who doesn’t have any arguments, and I don’t believe in “Russian bias,” so
1 Like
He’s a troll man. Don’t bother
I don’t tend to lean that way myself but recent motnhs have been rather telling
Ai maxxing
2 Likes
That’s okay - if you don’t want to answer the actual topic of the BMPT and Russian Bias in 2026…now, on to a really important question.
Bearing in mind my original point after posting up a hit log of me tanking 4x PARS ATGMS while sat in a stock BMPT in the middle of a cap.
“In fact it is so bad that anybody who ever says that Gaijin isn’t blatantly favouring the RU tech tree with BS vehicle modelling, BS vehicle performance and BS vehicle options is a complete and total muppet.”
Would you like to be Beaker or Kermit? I’m thinking you’d probably be more Beaker myself.
Dudes actual statement before hand makes no sense in english either
1 Like
Dont engage man , ive usually been a fighter of Russian biases and malarkey as such. Right now weve
All the crap with GRB, BMPT, PANTSIR SVSM, 38MT reload buff t80s etc.
Arb weve the su30 premium dominant tk the point ive copped one.
Su30mk2 at top tier slamming as well.
Naval at higher / top tier is domiated by the sveskry or whatever it is.
But this dudes just baiting
2 Likes
I’m gonna be that guy but I’ve tanked more than 4 PARS/Spikes in a ZTZ99A and even a Challenger 2 and Type 10 without taking damage
The BMPT is busted
PARS and Spikes are also just crap at dealing damage at times
Spoiler
Never
1 Like
both PESA and AESA can go into track mem when bad guy plane is notching and changing alt.
1 Like
Yes it does not work against ESA radars in real life but for balance and gameplay loop purposes they do in war thunder. No towed decoys or ecm modeled yet.
Sovetsky Soyuz
And now onto : guess the OP shell that defies physics ?
1 -
2 -
3 -
Answers
If you answered 2 on the first question - tons of additional armor in the front offering additional protection to ammo rack and 420mm plate of cemented armor that didn’t even exist - and 3 on the second question - shell with as much pen as the other 406mm and almost as much as a 460 while having almost twice the explosive amount and +50m/s of muzzle velocity relative to its competition - congratulations ! you win
That’s the one man, thing stopped me playing naval lol, like completely
1 Like
Oh yeah? so how come over a certain middle eat conflic that is oging right now stealth fighters can fly around modern SPAA’s? the same russia is using? where are the videos of f-35’s or f-22’s going down?
Guess what… you can detect from some distance but not get a launch solution from far away…
Old tech f-22 has still much better stealth then supposed su-57 xd which is proven by multiple conflicts and how much you can see that in a war in europe :)
but guess what when the 5th gen come here gajin will buf the su-57 as much as possible just like bmpt… it will be so much propaganda that the eu council will intervene xD
Fat guess: because those SPAA are actually not that modern at least not compared to the modern AESA radars cofcof had in mind
3 Likes
One has to ask also - if Stealth is as useless as ColCof says it sure is - I think he needs to get Lockheed Martin, Northrop, Sukhoi, Chengdu, BAE, Leonardo, on the phone ASAP.
They’re all wasting their time trying to make their aircraft stealthy - because someone on the WT forums said so.
-Spoiler Alert-
Stealth is far from useless.
AESA is not the all-seeing Eye of Sauron that some people think it is.
Anyone who proclaims that X or Y system negates Stealth is probably trying to sell it you.
2 Likes
I dont think he actually said that stealth in general is useless just that with the current map sizes and equipment that stealth fighters would be facing its not the all dominating superpower some people make it out to be.
Stealth is not that useless.
Currently with how the F-117 is modelled it is capable avoiding Fox-3’s by dropping bombs at ≈5km
Im not saying it is, im just saying that i cant really see Gaijin making stealth fighters the superweapons some make them out to be.