pretty sure it was on a brochure as a X-38, but thats just from memory
Yes its insanely well documented that they were unable to build a capital ship the size of Soyuz.
Because Yorck is based on the Bayern class so theres a direct reference thats almost the same. There is no for Soyuz.
Man i wish there was an active thread where that conclusion was explained multiple times…
I’ve follow the KH-38 topic semi closely, i have not seen that debunking, could you please link it?
1 Like
Well yeah, It’s a missile family and i think the image was on the MT page of the brochure IIRRC.
2 Likes
I was a part of that thread, did not see any debunking of that image in particular.
1 Like
That doesn’t debunk anything though?
2 Likes
They could not finish it in time due to the war. There have been delays because of some issues with armor, but IIRC it happened to other navies as well.
Mackensen, not Bayern.
You know, the issue is even if we agree that it is fake (assume for a sec that it is), the same people moaning about that one somehow interestingly do not moan about the L23 APFSDS that was proven to be fake.
Or not at all well never know since they didnt finish it and nothing like it.
Bayern (and Derfflinger) are the closest existing Designs thats what you can base Yorcks model on
So you saying that the were unable to build them is false, since we cant know it for sure.
Stop shifting goalposts.
Well of course not, players are going to have their areas of interest and aren’t going to discuss a similar issue found in every other area where they aren’t as interested. It’s going to be true the other way around as well, those that are interested in and are complaining about L23 likely aren’t going to be complaining about KH-38MT. That’s just a normal thing that happens. Bring it up also doesn’t help as it’s more of an “whataboutism” thing.
So is you saying that they could.
Im not. Bayern and Derfflinger existed so you can reasonably work out Yorcks theoretical performance in most regards. You cannot do the same with Soyuz since there is nothing real thats close to it
That picture is from Zhuhai brochure under 38MTE.
No. These are just all about double standards. They cry russian bias for even the slightest inaccuracies (even if those arent even inaccuracies) yet they are completely silent about any other nation’s actually incorrect/fake stuff.
It is not. It is exposing their double standards.
Funny.
I don’t see the connection, it is a whataboutism argument. “They are complaining about x thing, but what about y thing?”
Acting like this thread has an actual topic lol
1 Like
Exactly, so it can get closed.