Never said it was a saint.
West has learned how to hide their shady business through corporate takeovers and proxy warfare.
I don’t think F-16AJ is a WW2 addition from 8 years ago.
1 Like
You mean the KH38ML thats mounted?
That’s definitely not ML.
Neither is it MT
Pretty much the same appearance as the missile shown as MT back in 2017 or something.
pretty sure that was a ML, but even then;
We know nothing of the seeker, if it even functioned, if it can be fired, etc.etc.
This aint a MT
Out of curiosity; what are you basing that conclusion on?
And in what way is russia better in that regard?
i agree it should go now that Japan has the Thai tree
This post was flagged by the community and is temporarily hidden.
Based on the fact that someone already debunked the image
pretty sure it was on a brochure as a X-38, but thats just from memory
Yes its insanely well documented that they were unable to build a capital ship the size of Soyuz.
Because Yorck is based on the Bayern class so theres a direct reference thats almost the same. There is no for Soyuz.
Man i wish there was an active thread where that conclusion was explained multiple times…
I’ve follow the KH-38 topic semi closely, i have not seen that debunking, could you please link it?
1 Like
Well yeah, It’s a missile family and i think the image was on the MT page of the brochure IIRRC.
2 Likes
I was a part of that thread, did not see any debunking of that image in particular.
1 Like
That doesn’t debunk anything though?
2 Likes
They could not finish it in time due to the war. There have been delays because of some issues with armor, but IIRC it happened to other navies as well.
Mackensen, not Bayern.
You know, the issue is even if we agree that it is fake (assume for a sec that it is), the same people moaning about that one somehow interestingly do not moan about the L23 APFSDS that was proven to be fake.