they are both the same missile he just made the joke that one its the MT cuz of the different angle the light its refracting on it, they are both and ML just that the light casting on one its better than the other
1 Like
Interesting, I wonder why its still shown in brochures in 2024 if its no longer advertised by ROE
Man, you literally cannot make anything out of that picture, I also pointed out that the missile on the right is most likely the MT because it does not cast shadows and does not have any rims around its seeker lmao.
1 Like
If that ring was an reflection it would be visible on the one side only.
2 Likes
It does.
Also what the red circles even are supposed to be proof of? It’s the mountingpoint that both missiles have.
2 Likes
and typhoon doesnt get fnf armament. Russia still could get Tv missles etc.
Its fair that russia gets an imaginerary missle but typhoon isnt allowed to get an fnf missle
definitly seems fair
2 Likes
idc about typhoon. And this is not the Thread for that.
I mean, the EF2000 still is banging, you can lock the laser on and go 3rd person, like wtih GBU’s however the KH38MT should be removed until we get some confirmation of its existence.
The KH29T would do fine on the su30 for example
1 Like
i think RU strategy is
they are advertising it to china
China buy RU = more money
more money = more development on missiles
missiles done = finally IR ordinance
profit and sucess
its a comparison to similar situations.
Your whole statement just is useless and untrue. its nothing fair about it or sth that needs to be fullfilled
oh hey gun job since u are here can u check the above
If they were really that desperate to ask for funding for an IR seeker, they would probably give out information on what they’re wanting to build and with what performance, to entice supporters.
Seeing how vaguely mentioned the IR part is, I think it’s already incorporated to the missile.
Look where the circle is and the top bar or whatever it is. You can see exactly where the circle is.
1 Like
im pretty sure that part wont be on the brochure
So first give me your money and only then I’ll tell you about the important thing.
I don’t think that’s how funding works.
2 Likes
there is absolutely nothing there man that’s straight up just cope if you ask me specially because there is setoffs on the bottom and top of the missile wich start where the rail on top starts wich on the ML picture it dosent have and neither does the MT mockup
In some cases in teh past it has actually, the advertise it being able to do X. and Y but can only do Y or X , usually ends up with both models thouhg unless one of them is just out and out better than the other.
I have nothing to cope with. I was against the Kh-38MT from the very beginning. It looks more like you’re coping.