If the Russian government got a dollar every time someone posts the same useless pamphlets and pictures , they probably could afford the missile.
you wouldnt belive that it existed even if it would impact in your living room
so show me evidence that it is not existing
i showed some that it does
2 Likes
Well, two of the worst offenders (US/GER) are pretty much in charge of the show.
It’s also funny how Ukraine is all over the news, most likely so the French exploitation of Africa goes under the radar.
SS can’t show numbers for only ARB or GRB.
So find me something that states the missile still isn’t usable.
1 Like
Bait used to be believable.
Ground is still the better statistic since you need top tier tanks to efficiently play the Rafale
again cant find a negative
What’s bait, the fact they’re in charge or that they’re the biggest offenders ?
That still doesn’t tell you anything.
People could just be playing tanks, without even spawning air.
We found a sales brochure that offers the missile to it’s customers.
You have to find something.
1 Like
Gotta love whataboutism
Come back once you have some evidence that the 38mt is not real because unlike you I have a picture od an Kh38mt mounted to an aircraft and not just a picture advertising tvc for operating countries of the Eurofighter
1 Like
the second.
Not entirely true. You can filter for games played which shows 13.0 games that can only be achieved with the Rafale. And thats 1.5 mill for USSR and 293k for France, it would be an insane stretch so say that they have a similar playrate.
literally impossibe since there isnt anything.
Its not whataboutism at all.
Heres a test document for the TVR https://web.archive.org/web/20140520003353/http://ftp.rta.nato.int/public/PubFullText/RTO/MP/RTO-MP-051/MP-051-PSF-12.pdf
and heres a video https://www.reddit.com/r/EngineeringPorn/comments/nbkki1/eurofighter_typhoon_thrust_vectoring_nozzle/
You have a picture in a pamphlet of something being mounted on a plane, no test documents, no production documents, and no documentation what plane could even carry the weapon
Yes it is
I asked you for proof that the Kh38mt is fake and you come along with tvc for the ef
That is the end of this if you can’t prove anything stop it
1 Like
Its not whataboutism, both have similar levels of proofs for existence, for both its not enough to warrant addition into the game. Yet one is in game and the other isnt. Its an example to show the double standard not to disprove the existence of the MT
I guess you’re ignorant to things that were happening not even a century ago.
Fair enough.
But saying that Rafale is not so much of a big deal just because it’s played less is an extremely awful argument.
You can’t prove a negative, at least that’s what you said. Zhuhai brochure was hidden from the western eyes for months just because it was posted on Chinese sites.
So get back to searching.
Until then 38MT is very much a real missile.
1 Like
Im not i just dont see how that would be more relevant for people nowadays than all the stuff in recent history.
Its not an argument, its an explanation why ground rb complaints about the Rafale are lower than about the KH38
Not how this works, theres multiple statements and examples that Gaijin requires the weapon being testfired by the respective or a comparable plane to warrant addition.
Also if its real then why is there no evidence whatsoever except for an old brochure?
It’s real just doesn’t function like it does in game.
Cannot track moving targets in IR mode as stated by the missile developer. For moving targets they recommend Radar or SAL mode.
1 Like
Well, some are implemented with certain features (e.g. guns) that were not actually “as built”. Where the actual project acquired different ones, to make up for delays and there were no prototypes of the preferred armament actually completed but they are implemented anyway, with an estimated stat block by scaling up existing shells to the planned caliber.
It’d be like the US suddenly getting the Tillman IV-2, from the series of “Maximum Battleships” simply because Construction was started as a single armored plate was cut for the project, to be mounted in the senator’s office until it was to be installed into the hull.
If you think that you should look up the definition of whataboutism
This was about the Kh38mt and not the ef
You presented a prime example of whataboutism
Whataboutism - Wikipedia Whataboutism - Wikipedia
1 Like
noun: whataboutism
the technique or practice of responding to an accusation or difficult question by making a counter-accusation or raising a different issue.
Its the same issue, features added to the game via flimsy sources. Theres a direct correlation
You just dont undestand what whataboutism is
Yes that is exactly what you did
You couldn’t present any proof that the Kh38mt is not real so you switched topic to the tvc nozzles of the ef
1 Like
Just because it isn’t happening to you doesn’t mean it’s irrelevant. Those things shouldn’t be as easy to forget.
War in AFG ended like 3-4 years ago and people already forgot the atrocities. Seems fit.
And it shouldn’t be like that as Rafale is as good as anything wielding 38s.
Rules that apply until they don’t.
There’s multiple pieces of evidence to back this up.
Remember our talk about filler stuff ?
Brochure is from 2024, so it’s not really old.
It might very well be a niche missile with not so many units made or sold.
1 Like
And such is the case for many things.
Hammer is a great example of this as well.
1 Like