Check this out guys
1 Like
Yeah, so based on fairly recent history we should see hate going towards a few western nations as well.
Tornado is at 12.3.
Once again, 12.3 lineups can see 11.3 while 13.0 lineups can only see 12.0 ones. Handwaving this obvious advantage is strange. You also had Rafale at 12.7 for a long while, which also butchered 12.3 Tornado in pretty much every category, but that isn’t a problem I suppose.
What a fine piece of evidence that proves bias is real lmao.
2 Likes
We do? A lot of it actually. The difference is just that you get more hate if you have no positive impact in the world whatsoever
They still occupy the same games 90%+ of the time so a comparison is more than fair.
I never said the Rafale is not a problem, it absolutely is but the hammers are a lot worse than the KH38 and Rafales are rarer in general so the imbalance is not as present
If bias wasnt real there wouldnt be so many players playing russia XD
1 Like
You can’t prove a negative.
There’s multiple other built ships that employ the same armor, guns , machinery etc. German capital shipbuilding is very well documented for that time so we have actual real life reference to build paper ships from. None of this applies to Soyuz.
3 Likes
Lets add Kikka to the mix as it’s pretty much a Frankenstein plane with fictional guns that it never mounted.
That country, to this day, remains the only one that tossed not one but two atomic bombs on civilian towns. I won’t even start on Germany.
Did i hurt your feelings?
1 Like
Not really, im just baffled everyday again when i come here.
2 Likes
I don’t see it to be honest.
Rafale has a lot of battles under it’s belt in recent times.
It’s played almost the same as German EFT and in August it only had like 100k games less overall.
In this case you can by finding a document that states the project has been cancelled.
Those things don’t just disappear without any paper trail.
1 Like
You keep using the word literally to emphasise what you mean, when it is you who quite clearly doesn’t understand how your statement argues against itself.
It is quite relevant as I am stating your level of English isn’t as high as you think it is.
Over using the word literally is a sign of this.
Definition of literally as per cambridge dictionary.
- adverb
- using the real or original meaning of a word or phrase.
Or the infromal use (which tends to be over used and incorrectly used)
- simply or just.
That is completely irrelevant to what you stated.
You stated his sources didn’t justify his claim.
When they clearly did.
The logical connection is there quite clearly.
Your outright refusal of them doesn’t mean they aren’t there.
Kamov was blatantly OP when added and it has taken years to toe it in line.
His conclusion is it is russian, therw for russian bias.
Oppose to say, premium bias, which is far more likely.
You can’t even spell finaly yet are trying to infrom me the one who has had to cite sources to gain my diploma how to cite them.
You as the debater have to cite your own sources to refute the oppositions.
That is how this works.
Not just saying Nuh hu.
He quite clearly has stated multiple times how they are connected.
I don’t ageee with him at all mind you.
However your flat out denial of information that has been presented numerous times in front of you is glaringly obvious.
You are in fact choosing to ignore the provided evidence, links and conclusion as it goes against what you believe.
As I stated I’m aware it is not bias for Russia, however his conclusion points him towards bias as I have stated.
You haven’t provided a source to diswade him or activity counter what he says at all.
Again over using literally. It doesn’t make you sound smarter to use it 4 or 5 times in the space of 2 replies.
They are cherry picked, however find me any study, or claims that do not use cherry picked sources.
Edit, now this has gone on long enough, you clearly have less of an understanding of the language you use than you would like to think.
Go back to debating or not if you think Gaijins incompetence or bias is at fault.
3 Likes
Well obviously events in Eastern Europe are more in the spotlight rn but acting like there’s no hate is just wrong.
[quote=“MotorolaCRO, post:3566, topic:223951”]
It’s played almost the same as German EFT and in August it only had like 100k games less overall.
You’re looking at numbers including air rb, you have to look at ground rb 13.0
If the program isn’t cancelled but the weapon is not in an operational state then you won’t find cancellation documents
If the Russian government got a dollar every time someone posts the same useless pamphlets and pictures , they probably could afford the missile.
you wouldnt belive that it existed even if it would impact in your living room
so show me evidence that it is not existing
i showed some that it does
2 Likes
Well, two of the worst offenders (US/GER) are pretty much in charge of the show.
It’s also funny how Ukraine is all over the news, most likely so the French exploitation of Africa goes under the radar.
SS can’t show numbers for only ARB or GRB.
So find me something that states the missile still isn’t usable.
1 Like
Bait used to be believable.
Ground is still the better statistic since you need top tier tanks to efficiently play the Rafale
again cant find a negative