Never stated btw, and hate can be seen here on you emphisizing on that, especially with that nickname and being proven wrong, checking account after someone comments once on it 😁
Would there be no hatred you wouldnt be coming here emphisizing on it now wouldnt it be?
Funny cuz I never emphisized anything other than your clear hatred and ignorance.
I dont need silly report buttons, I have my own life to care about rather than a random 😁
Glad you agree on your act of profile checking not being communication, hope you learn to call things their real name in the future! Be well
Yes, this is the problem of most “Soviet” tanks, NOT Russian, but SOVIET! Don’t get confused!
The USSR is a “union” of 15 (in some cases 16) countries. Therefore, all tanks, missiles, planes are the property of all 15 countries… By the way, ask the AI chat bots which of them entered “voluntarily”
The big problem is the “automatic loader” as they themselves could feel getting into it launches the “Russian space program”
Even now, the new tanks that are being praised in Russia have quite big flaws, two or three generations behind modern tanks from the USA, Germany, Canada, Sweden, Korea and Japan
Can you not bring politic into this , also if you asking an AI chat bot for your history source then I think you might want to rethink before you start talking about history
So ignoring that the autoloader is partly due to the Soviet wanted to cut cost cause their doctrine demand large fleet of tank ? Ignoring that the T series was designed before the introduction of blowout panel and what not. Also not taking into account the tank was made to have smaller profile than Western tank , so in case of one getting their turret pop it most likely due to ambush. Which no tank in the world gonna be able to automatically bounce a shot from the side or even from a above in many case. That not to say “Western tank le bad , Sov tank le good” , T series def have it down side but they are far from bad. It just that next time don’t bring politic in and some other random stuff people tell you about that you like because it fit your agenda
The only way they can make them (Chinese / Russian MBTs) better is by nerfing NATO MBTs.
For example, adding turret baskets to every MBT, which affects NATO MBTs more so than Chinese / Russian MBTs.
The difference in capabilities (effeciency) would then be smaller, which is good if we want them to be the same BR as one another. If not, then it’s not a good idea if they are meant to be different in BR (which isn’t the case as of yet).
None of that will help solve the issue of bad gun depression, survivability, and reload speed (the latter probably won’t change unless Gaijin chooses to reduce it).
Gun depression: There is a clear modeling error with the built-in depression of Chinese tanks (in which the turret itself is tilted forwards by multiple degrees in real life). To my knowledge, this is not implemented in game.
Survivability: All Chinese 3rd generation tanks have spall liners. This is basically almost every top tier Chinese tank. None of the MBTs have received them. Even though spall liners have been in the game for 2 years…
Not to mention the absolutely saddening number of armour issues that exist between game and real life…
Reload speed: The speed of autoloader should be 6.5 seconds, not 7.1, for most loads. It can be artificially tuned to be even higher, but Gaijin only does this to Western tanks.
The T90M and T80BVM should reload faster, but nooo ‘average speed’ was used. But NATO tanks reloading at 5s on the move, constantly, without being tired is very fair and balanced
Which ‘western’ autoloaded tanks have had their reloads artificially tuned higher than sources ? Because I can’t name any of those, but I can name some western autoloaded tanks with reloads slower than what sources exist for.
I don’t think the double standard you think exists, actually exists.
Could it not be argued this is somewhat asymmetrically balanced? Like looking at the 5s manual tanks, Abrams has a giant turtleneck weakspot, and Ariete and Merkava don’t have any armour whatsoever. If they’re lucky enough to not get one shot - all of them are losing crew every time they’re hit, so that 5s reload doesn’t last long. They’re only ever one hit away from reloading slower than their RU counterparts.
80BVM/90M meanwhile have that reload guaranteed regardless of crew count.
I think it’s also worth pointing out, Ace reloads either involve a monolithic grind or a relatively substantial paywall. Most players you come across are unlikely to have it. Heck, I see loads of players who don’t even expert their tanks because they can’t afford it. If someone wants their Abrams to have 5s reload without several hundred battles of grind beforehand, it’s going to cost them 1.1m SL & 2,300 GE. 80BVM/90M meanwhile get their best reload for nothing.
Not really. The only things that toptier Russian tanks have going for it would be armour via ERA (if people suck and don’t hit the same weakspots that has existed since 9.3) and reload consistency via autoloader.
Sure, that autoloader is an advantage, but with Leos and so on having superior mobility and gun handling, it makes them a struggle to play.
Further, with the autoloader module modeled, getting shot anywhere more or less guarantees it to break. even if they hit the very back of the turret, the autoloader will break because it hit the arm, not even the carousel itself. Very silly, but I doubt gaijin will fix it anytime soon knowing their track record.
As for the modelling of the autoloader being comparable to turret baskets on the Abrams and Leos, I think they are relatively equal. I disagree with the ways they both were implemented, and I think they should’ve refined the baskets to make them less ‘hittable’, but seeing that any shot that doesn’t kill you in a T-series tank destroys your autoloader, this is somewhat ‘fair’.
I mean, everything in game is outclassed by the appliqué Leopards. That’s not unique to RU tanks. Though, we got here by talking about tanks with 5s reload, and these Leo’s have 7.8 > 6.4 > 6s reload. Which again, given the majority you will face have standard/expert crew, That’s either worse or comparable RoF to BVM.
Atleast u didnt get baskets. Try playing italy japan usa and france then u will know how bad it is. Tho france and usa are quite good when it comes to tanks but they require much MUCH higher skill to be at the same level as russia
