bro…here is evidence that gaijin is just blatantly ignoring legitimate evidence Community Bug Reporting System
1 Like
you’re not including the fact that it was “accepted” 2 years ago and has since been closed with no further statement from Gajin on the matter. and nothing still has changed since then at all.
3 Likes
Accepted means passed to devs, meaning not ignored.
Allegedly not acted on is not being ignored.
If I make a statement about chocolate you don’t address, you didn’t ignore it, you just didn’t act on it.
So they’re lazy to fix countless problems or they just do not want to fix them.
6 Likes
well to be fair russian tanks are just statisticlly not good there death traps for the most part
You have to ask it from the devs, man.
bro you are literally not listening to what I’m saying. “accepted” 2 years ago and has since been closed with no further statement from Gajin on the matter. everyone will agree that if this has been a known thing for two years and for them to close the report after accepting it and no further statement or change has been made is just showing the utter ignorance Gajin shows even though that they have been given the legitimate data to make an argument as to why the Merkava’s are inaccurate. why is there a report system if Gajin wont “act” on the situation and still claim to have a realism and listen to their community?
7 Likes
im pretty sure they just take suggestions throw them in a pile of papers and only use them when there desprate
3 Likes
not bro yapping about levels when he wasted around 5k hours on that game lmao
Lmao 5k hours , level 30 when they become sheeper and follow people who come up with the worst take on the forum . Worthless
what have I just read? ah, worst take… Well, worst take is thinking top tier Russia is bad when we have like 4-5 worse ground nations
1 Like
1 Like
Well, now I’m absolutely sure that you’re Russian. I’d write to you about how you presented yourself, but I won’t.
lmao a single comment triggered you so bad you went checking on my messages xD
1 Like
This post was flagged by the community and is temporarily hidden.
1 Like
That’s really not what communication is. Drop the nice act, it really doesnt suit your actions)
Communication is act of exchanging with eachother, while this is you checking my account to justify your hate towards me xD Communication would be speaking with me, not going through my account, call things their real name)
What’s really funny is how it was just a single message that forced you all this chain reaction)
1 Like
The sheer fact they never competed as they never meant to be. T-90 (188) was simply a step up from T-72 as T-72 was never let be proper FCS, even though UVZ tried hard to catch up on FCS by using 1G42 sight and other ATGMs complex they were simply not allowed to. Probably Kharkiv being loved at that time is the reason. USSR was really political about it and could prioritise a tank over other just from it. Hence why Object 167M was cancelled being finished, tested and put in production just cus 432 existed (they didnt even allow them to compete to see whats better, it’s clearly opposite of a thing such as competition, a thing that clearly pushes progress forward in tech, and it was already obvious 167M would just be more reliable.), hence why 1G42 for T-72A was cancelled, resulting even in T-72B FCS staying behind (it did have lead calculated, but not automatically inputed by sight, as well it had worse magnifications).
And while there’s actual order of 188 from goverment to be built, there’s no such for 187 as it was always a personal one from UVZ.
While 477 was kinda “next gen smth tank”, 187 was way better than T-72B but clearly would not be so affordable and would end up like Oplot (it’s comparision in affordability, Ukraine simply never bought anywhere meaningful amount, with 50 tanks being by far biggest amount of them bought, which is still little, but at le something), being bought in so little amount and forgotten. 188 (T-90) was clearly step up they wanted from T-72B and was in fact affordable. 188 (T-72BU) was clearly not a step up from T-72B, as it had same outdated 1A40-1 sight complex that T-72B had.
i have to say after a long time not playing toptier i recently started again playing top tier and i noticed that russian tanks sometimes can tank quite good, but in the most cases the first shot disables your breach or autoloader and turret traverse and you loose one crew member, then you can eat one or two shots on your turret because your breach is already defect and then you die, on the other hand a lot of nato tanks eat quite good your shots, (leo looses quite fast its gunbreach to) for example against abrams i had it quite often, you see their turret side and the shot only kills the loader, not the turret traverse or the breach, only the loader because the american loader is bulletproof so the dart cant get trough him… and this happens quite often
Did I show hatred towards you somewhere? There is a “button” to complain there!
I only wrote that YOU gave yourself away, with your statements that you are Russian.
I will not explain what gave you away, because you can block your monitor with anger