By the time you guide those 12 Vikhrs in, FnF helicopter already reloaded like twice.
Do they even care about them?
The only thing they care about is how miserable they are
and blame Strv122/2A7 for it.
You can’t reason with the people who can only use the same excuse such as
Muh Gun depression.
Muh Reverse.
Muh survivability.
and every defeat
blame Strv122 and Leopard.
2 Likes
We need Ariete meta to be honest.
Ah yes , it is always “You are wrong and biased while we are right and godlight”. It is ok for Ark boi and other to complain about US being weak BUT the moment you start talking about how bad USSR is he start shaking and calling name and pointing finger. Gotta love how Ger/Swed have not once being mentioned but bro gotta do it anyway cause he have nothing else to add in this conversation. Wait what do you mean talking about tank and it stats and performance is a good way to judge a tank good or bad ? Don’t you see how bad other nations are ? The other nation suck mean USSR have no right to be this or that
1 Like
I have stat and K/D to back it up
are you?
And again , you could call me name and it is a better way than
This does not add anything to the convo and proof nothing
RU tanks are good but surely aren’t the best.
Some countries have much worse tanks that should be buffed before RU ones.
1 Like
Prove that i didn’t pull it out of my a*s “without reasons”
I understand that but just like another thread about RU air being mid. If you feel like the need to call out other nation being weak, clearly you don’t care, make a thread about it. It is a problem then feel free to make thread and talk about it cause it help the game , not coming into A nation and bring up B,C and D nation to avoid talking about the main problem. The dude did it before and he doing the same thing.
So what are you trying to prove in here ? Add nothing beside “RU main and their reasons why their main suck” then pull out stats card ? All yap no bite
What I do not understand is what people claiming that Russia suffers/is miserable/whatever want.
What is it that you want? What do you seek?
When people make threads about other nations, they bring out legitimate concerns and suggest fixes. Challenger 2 LFP spall liners and many other armor and survivability issues, Challenger 2’s first-order ammorack size and replenishment speeds, Leclerc and Merkava’s underperforming armor concerns, Chinese MBT missing spall liners and armor holes, Type 10’s mobility issues, Abrams turret rings and turret armor, Ariete’s whole existence…
And then we have this; a thread claiming that Russian MBTs are miserable because… because they have the gun depression and reverse speed they have in real life? What should we do? Make their gun clip through the hull to remove one of their only downsides? Give them an artificially fast reverse speed? Add T-14 Armata? What’s the goal of this?
It would be fine by me if T-90M and T-80BVM got 3BM59 if it happened to be better so that Russia got a firepower increase; or if Russia could get slightly faster reload speeds to help them in the meta as long as these new reloads were realistic (same goes for China). But I can’t see what else can be done here. A second and improved T-80BVM was leaked and is likely coming soon, that will be a significant boost to the lineup.
7 Likes
maybe because if they don’t thread like this probably don’t exist?
it like someone post thread about how Sweden top tier tanks miserable while they don’t (yet i never saw one which is good)
It mean the nation does not give a good gaming experience. Not because the nation is weak, all those weak point being mentioned by OP does exist but that doesn’t mean they are weak. Funny how one side trying to downplay it and one side make it out to be the strongest tank line in the game. If you guys can’t even stay in the middle why bother talking about vehicle balancing ?
Because no one care. Literally no one care enough about other nation unless they are the big three. That why minor nation player are that good. These are real and important issue yet barely any thread about this. But no one care so cope seeth and mald. There should be more attention yet no one talking about it , only now in the thread about RU you people start bringing it up ? Isn’t it funny ? You thought talking about it in here would help ? It is just that pathetic
I actually saw one some time ago lol.
Someone claiming that the Strv 122s NEEDED DM53 for “balance” because “their firepower was bad”.
6 Likes
hm did they? I never saw one (maybe i do but forgot due to it was very long time) compared to how miserable Russian are that can be see almost daily.
1 Like
Apparently this is the kind of thing a biased Russian mains says according to some on this forum, when it’s a balanced opinion.
2 Likes
Yeah I get you, but you need to understand that buffing already good tanks without firstly buffing worse ones creates an even bigger power gap.
Increasing the power gap is the last thing we need.
1 Like
Yeah I love when people call me biased after I defend vehicles that rely on a single thing in order to be playable.
Some posters simply don’t understand what’s balanced.
2 Likes
Im not saying bufffing them. I only said that they don’t provide an enjoyable gaming experience. Compare to say Jap or france can offer in the same department. Which the guy who made the thread does have a point, even if he only focusing the downside of the T series as a whole. It is always peak comedy when people talking about how minor nation need A or B as if they care. They only do that when Major nation being the main topic.
Have you tried playing other tiers/nations ?
1 Like