Dude im playing since 2013 and all nations, at the least in GF and this kind of nerfs always are for the same nation.
If you want totally unplayable Germany, yes that BRs make sense LOL.
2 Likes
I started with German tanks, and after having played the others they feel downright spoiled rotten in so many ways. I stand by the BRs I propose. We have nothing more to discuss, I’m afraid.
Mate, never engage with a “German Victim” player. It is hilarious but also very scary.
Smell like a bile.
Yeah…I had not interacted with one for quite some time, so I was frankly caught off-guard.
Are there some areas that feel kinda iffy with their tree? Of course, but many of those same issues apply to more than just their tree.
For example, APCR being so pitifully weak (and in almost all cases missing penetration by a huge amount) most of the time is partially why the short and even the long 50mm guns are a menace in low ranks, causing the platforms with both to sit at BRs they have no sane reason being that low. It is also to a lesser extent why the long-barrel Panzer IVs are in the same boat. HEAT postpen being bad causes German, Italian, and various other HEAT dispensers in both interwar BRs and 5.7+ to sit where they have no business being that low.
Then, related partly to this thread and related CAS debate threads, many SPAAGs are missing ammo types, including German ones. But again, not solely their issue.
I could go on and on.
1 Like
cries in sweden
coming back to this poll after 2 days straight of 90% deaths to planes and heli in grb and wondering when they devs will pay attention to votes
Thank you for bringing this thread up. I thought the idea of TO was dead since the topic is very under used.
So, maybe behind the scenes they are noting it; this is not the only issue players bring to Gaijin and expecting more answers for a comparatively low population mode when an answer has already been given (big no) is quite an ask, without any progress on the TO for RB suggestion (almost same non-proactive debate since 2018! 6 YEARS with no attempt for players to own this).
On the player side it is surely a TO advocates priority/goal to convince Gaijin that it is a good idea?
If this thread focused on a positive route to turning Gaijin’s mind (props to Richardtheguy and the bulk of this topic, just underused) then we would be more steps closer than in the last 6 years (saying some people do not like the GFRB mode as they do not want aircraft in such matches, or that anyone using/liking the aircraft in the mode is “bad” in some way, has not done anything but cause arguments and has not moved the topic to a point Gaijin might reply).
Any questions as to “why” there is this situation of no TO GFRB mode are for Gaijin and distract from things players can do.
Best of luck getting to the next step (since older TO advocates never worked out how to move forward)
Attempt 210,985 to get the topic on the right track (cough why do CAS users go against [no]Suggestions? cough)
Time for a change yet?
Tldr: so happy YOU found this thread when most others avoid it.
1 Like
meds
this game is one step forward 25 steps back plain and simple, CAS players you can have this garbage game.
2 Likes
You stop playing WT?
I have pretty much stopped playing ,not been on for a while.Not missing it after being such a fan for so long.The game just died in only a few months.No big goodbyes but just don’t bother any more what with all the ruining of maps etc .Credit card is taken off so no more purchases.
I think that is what Gaijin want,the older ,long term players out o the game.
Even a TO mode would not save it .
1 Like
I play less and less every day, It is the style of play that pushed me away. Every game is one sided. Good spots are gone, games at all tiers are full of matchbox cars. Constant upteirs, Will not discuss map rotation. I log in to get my daily login. There is more but not going to waste time with complaining.
1 Like
If only there was a topic asking for a TO.
And then people using this to form queries to the people who can answer!
Existence of topic will not get an answer (partly since already answered).
Again, get together (lots of poll support) and make a new push to the decision makers. They are all that counts here, no player/s have effected their position.
Existence of topic will not get an answer.
Fill your boots and best of luck (saying you have had enough is all very good, but that won’t sway anything either. Not saying people mean for it to, but makes the topic a bit dumpstery).
I´d love to play tank-only. Not always, but those rare matches without the else omnipresent threat from above are just a completely different - not less interesting - game. So yes, more variety makes the game even better.
1 Like
But then I guess there are as many opinions as players. I for instance would also love to see artillery without warning :).
1 Like
I would be furious not being able to try and give a bushed up rat what he deserves. (Getting CAS’d)
That´s the beauty of it. An additional game-mode does not deny anything enjoyable for you.
3 Likes
Nice to see somebody finally gets it.I would love TO only .I still paid for my Premium CAS which I love and will still use in regular GRB now and then.
3 Likes
Just need to grow the onions to ask a Dev/Mod.
1 Like