Maus is also not a ww2 tank. It never saw service.
it is a WW2 tank, it was actually constructed but i never faced combat.
soooo…
if it was made in WW2, it was a WW2 tank
not for nothing they made it in WW2
that is only your interpretation.
that isn’t my interpretation, it is the truth.
if they made the Maus in WW2, it was made to fight against WW2 tanks like the T34 or the M26
the IS-3 was made to fight against Tiger 2 (H) cuz it had a lot of angled armor, so the USSR needed less money to do a more armored tank and they saved money
It entered service in WW2 regardless of whether or not it saw battle. But I’m not going to start a fight over it, I’m just explaining what I think he meant, you can make up your own mind whether it qualifies or not.
The Maus actually did see combat, the 2nd prototype 205/2 was deployed into battle against the Red army to attempt to defend Kummersdorf before its crew destroyed it to prevent its capture.
1 Like
Seen no real evidence for this, mostly a myth