Put the Mi-4AV in 7.7 to get matched with 7.7 tanks and not APFSDS rounds

I have said many times on here that russia has issues in game like any other country has issues.

its optics are also 40% worse than the mi4’s

yeah, but Russia has a lot of issues

why u need better optics if u’re firing missiles at 2km?

duh

im comparing the mi4 to a heli that is at the br you want to put it at.

If you want to move the f16 to 1.0, then i will compare the f16 to the i15

3 Likes

not more than most other nations, just similar.

ok, then buff the bantam, idiot.
cuz all the players like u and me can do is play the game and tell gaijin to do things to make the game better

considering you say the you struggle with 10x zoom past 2km, i figured it would be an issue for you with 6x zoom at 2km

im not sure how they buff it.

1 Like

not more?
USA: all balanced, very good at practically all
Germany: extremely good, their tanks are the goat and the planes are absurdly ez to play
GB: non-explosive AP rounds, but a lot of armor and good reloads, and their planes are so op, like the lancaster or the jas 39
Japan: very bad lowtier tanks, but 4segs reload at toptier and almost the best planes of the game
China: almost copy-paste nation, but good tanks at all ranks and the planes are just too op, the J-10A is one of the best dogfighters of the game
Italy: good tanks at all ranks, they are like paper but their cannons are very good, and the planes are probably better than the german ones
France: the most OP nation, solid AP rounds but with a lot of armor, and some of their tanks can take a lot of shots before getting destroyed
Sweden: again, the most OP nation at all ranks, APDS at 1.0 and the Strv-103 is unbeatable from the front
Israel: meh, America copy-paste

but Russia? yeah, very good tanks at almost all ranks, but some of their planes suck in their own job, and the tanks of midtier are probably impossible to play against same br tanks

and yeah, i took the time to write ALL that shit to respond ur stupid comment.
so yes, if i need to go to the limit, i will go to the limit, i don’t actually care cuz i just want to balance the game for everyone, not just for “russian players”

correct

same with ussr

same with ussr

not going to go forward with this, point is russia isn’t disadvantaged.

Glad to know you aren’t being civil even though I’m one of the people who wasn’t insulting you. That won’t be the case in the future.

u never insulted me? i never saw u being “pacific” with me in other post, like the “F/A-18A ruined 11.7”
or other things like that.
so if u don’t treat me like a real person, then i don’t have any reasons to treat u like a real person

I never insulted you in that thread, and I am sure because I just went back and read through it. The closest I got to being “insulting” was me asking you if you just warp everything because you kept saying things that weren’t related to what I was saying

I think he means the IS-3, there where un-confirmed reports in Germany of a new Russian heavy tank on the Eastern front, then during the 1st V-day parade 4 months after Germanys surrender these guys showed up (at 6:06):

Spoiler

This text will be hidden

52 of them, so they where well into production by the end of the war even if none of the serial production ones made it to the front in time.
And I suspect that the “un-confirmed reports” where likely combat trials of the pre-production IS-3s, much like how the USA tested the P-80 in Italy.
IS-4 was also in development, but didn’t go into production until 1946

so u actually insulted me

1 time, but u insulted me, theeeen…
i can insult u

u aren’t the only one that came back to that post to read it again

So to summarize, the IS-3 is not a ww2 tank because zero confirmations exist of it being in combat, it was introduced into service basically at the caboose of WW2, and 95% of its service history exists post ww2.

PanzerKampfWagen VIII Maus context be like: