I mean if you want better aircraft for that area the UK itself used Canadairs Sabres, and ZA as well. (Giving them 3 possible Sabres. (UK)Mk 2, Mk 4, (ZA)Mk 6.
Well South Africa still has a number of aircraft it has that should be taken advantage of. I may disagree with the fact the ZA is a sub-tree and reather them spun out as well, they have been here long enough that they should be taken advantage of.
I do feel like half the people wanting India in Britain just want to avoid having to grind multiple TTs
With Britain, India and South Africa in a single TT we can have
Just seems like you might as well get rid of the TT system altogether at this rate
So play the Italian TT then.
You have the Typhoon, Gripen and AV-8B+.
I dont see why that means we need Su-30s, Mig-29s, Mig-21s and Rafales in our TT just because people grinded a tree and didnt like the British aircraft in it.
South Africa is like the one true sub tree since it isn’t generic copy paste like Holland is to France or Finland is to Sweden. It deserves the Cheetah, it’ll probably be the only good Rank VIII vehicle for fighting.
That is mostly what i saw too, i agree.
Anyway India should have been it’s own tree even if it was lot of copypaste just for how big the market that india is.
If we get Russian stuff, then we can prove Russian bias exists. I mean, they nerf Britain every update, so why not take advantage of something that avoids nerfs
Maybe, would still rather just get the British stuff unnerfed than to be forced to play aircraft I really have no interest in
Well that’s because War Thunder is a line-up based game is far better then being ripped apart.
As any Aussie or Canadian about their current treatment and they’ll make it very clear how unhappy they are.
Yeah, but we dont exactly have much Indian stuff yet anyway, so better to pull the plug early. OSA and Strela werent suppose to be added, so then it would have been the T-90 and Mig-21 which could have been replaced with better.
South Africa wasn’t a good sub-tree either. They all failed from day one.
A. It was unneeded (as both nations had more then enough and didn’t need each other and could have been separate TTs)
B. It only existed because Gaijin realize they can use it to nerf the UK.
Take a look at the CVRTs. The Fox proved UKs domestic lights where good, so they made it’s family members as bad as possible.
India-Israel Defense and Security Cooperation – The Diplomat
Israel and India have security cooperation and have openly stated that they will assist one another.
Let alone things like the Bosvark and ZA-35 coming at BRs where we already had SPAA and we still have nothing inbetween
I never stated my support for the existence of a Chinese tree
It’s not. I’d prefer it as an independent tree, and I was simply trying to explain to another user why the option in the poll for an Israeli subtree existed. Logically speaking it makes some sense, although I’d prefer a Chilean subtree more.
India and Israel have such military aliance that if India gets attacked by someone, Israel will send its units over to participate in the war?
low bar, really low bar.
Not even true necessarily either
comparing a user created tree to the one that exists in-game
So the United Kingdom, France, Russia, Germany and Japan should all be getting chinese vehicles?
that goes for every tree and potential tree. however if India is a British subtree we arent ever going to see the unique stuff as gaijin hates britain.
I do think in all honesty India shouldn’t ever be a subtree, but one of the nations either put into a BRICs tree or split into where the vehicle has its origins, and if its a completely homogenous design it should go to the nation which aided in its creation, IE arjun to Germany as the leopard designer was a main consultant or the german MTU engine
