I never stated my support for the existence of a Chinese tree
It’s not. I’d prefer it as an independent tree, and I was simply trying to explain to another user why the option in the poll for an Israeli subtree existed. Logically speaking it makes some sense, although I’d prefer a Chilean subtree more.
1 Like
India and Israel have such military aliance that if India gets attacked by someone, Israel will send its units over to participate in the war?
low bar, really low bar.
Not even true necessarily either
comparing a user created tree to the one that exists in-game
1 Like
So the United Kingdom, France, Russia, Germany and Japan should all be getting chinese vehicles?
that goes for every tree and potential tree. however if India is a British subtree we arent ever going to see the unique stuff as gaijin hates britain.
I do think in all honesty India shouldn’t ever be a subtree, but one of the nations either put into a BRICs tree or split into where the vehicle has its origins, and if its a completely homogenous design it should go to the nation which aided in its creation, IE arjun to Germany as the leopard designer was a main consultant or the german MTU engine
Well, I prefer that we keep India as a subtree rather than losing it, ‘unless we get another subtree as compensation’
(which is not gonna happen, and we are just going to be losing India alone because Gaijin hates us. if it happens.)
But I totally agree with you that all we will get will be nothing but lame exact Russian C&P even without any domestic weaponry. Su-7BMK, T-72, MiG-23BN will be example
Because Gaijin hates the Commonwealth and the British.
No unique vehicles will ever come.
Even the chance of getting ‘C&P, but with different weaponry’ will be low
(SHAR FRS.51 or Su-30MKI, which is armed with different missiles can be example)
2 Likes
Hardly unique if it offers little to no functional difference
And I wouldn’t be surprised if the modified vehicles had an extra MG or log strapped to them
1 Like
eeeh
when you have to stuff your user tree with 3 Vijyanta, several (slightly) modified BMP clones, 5 versions of Arjun just to declare yourself more unique than the existing Chinese tree
idk
you could create a more unique tree than that with the Type 69/79 family alone
It’s not so much a sub tree as much as using UK as a dumping ground
idc either way
just commit
either let me larp as USSR or use Commonwealth vehicles, not both
2 Likes
this is the main reason I’m not a fan of India in the brit tree, its all either just C&P from other trees or preexisting vehicles in the British tree or a pretty boring unique design which will have a million variants to clog up research time
agreed.
If I wanted to play crappy communist built vehicles id play the communist nations. I play britain for BRITISH and British style tanks not russian copy paste slop
I play India so I can get high and listen to Ravi Shankar
But India doesn’t have a lot of Copy/Paste
I never said you did
Fine, it’s more comparable to Italy happy now?
Why use it as an argument, then? It’s a non sequitur
Why isreal tech tree might receive Su-30MKI, MiG-21Bison, Mirage 2000H, Mirage 2000i, Sea Harrier FRS.51 (+LUSH), MiG-27UPG, Jaguar IS (DARIN II), Vijayanta, Bhishma TWMP, MiG-29K (9-41), AH-64E, MiG-29UPG, Tejas and etc ?
Israel tech tree might get F-39E/F Gripen (FAB), Northrop F-5 (FAB & FACH), F-16 (FACH), AMX A-1 (FAB), Mirage (FAB & FACH), Leopard (Chilean Army), IAI Kfir (FAC) and
In my opinion, it’s difficult gaijin transfer 2 researchable vehicles (Osa-AK & Strela-10M) and 4 premium vehicles (Bhishma TWMP (squadron), Vijayanta, Jaguar IS (event) & MiG-21 Bison) from great britain to independent Indian tech tree in 2 years
No way should India get its own tree. we don’t need any more tech trees we have far too many as it is.
1 Like