He must be getting paid by the post. Stat shaming is against the TOS, but it seems to be his go to tactic. On top of that, if he can’t argue against a point, he just arbitrarily declares it to be a “bug” or goes after the person personally. I’ve experience it first hand here.
4 Likes
Sure, now show me where? Besides that is not a “stat shaming”
And those bugs is fixed by my reports.
“If there is no skill and easymode why you are not in first places? It not faceroll at all, you need to play smart to live and score. It easier in aiming yes, but harder to live long, and it leads to more active gameplay, just like i said in my proposal year ago. And don’t forget that new aiming boosted those ships and boats which underperform previously like slow reloaders and those who had big guns but don’t have rangefinder mechanic for some reasons.”
“And when another “coastal” players tell me that there was “skill” in aiming i laugh. Farming bots and newbies at knife distances where aiming barely different, those who can’t do anything against you, like it was pre patch that’s ain’t no “skill”. You just been in safe zone from destroyers aren’t you, now you are easy prey for them if you play dumb as before. You had comfort in safety now it’s gone, deal with it.”
“Why do you loose match even with “Murmansk” on your side if there is no skill involved, then?”
“Form my point of view you gathered to play sealcubbing, and now seals have guns.”
“i didn’t say that all seals born knowing how to use a gun, but before change they were with wobbling noddle swords versus those who mastered art of gun-fu aka. (skrs and m-802)
i notice that players in average achieve higher results in both dmg and points(and this with aiming partially broken), sure it’s not all thank to aiming but other changes too.”
“you think playing or stop playing in 3.0- costal where newbies are dwell(like you and many other who complain here and in other treads) any noticeable?”
“Of course you don’t care about the bugs, cause you don’t care about the mode, you care about yourself been in comfort like before to play you beloved 2.3-4.0. If you cared you’ve been demanding the bugfixes.”
“I notice that you can’t handle the changes. And can’t proof that new system leave no skill.”
“You can look at this guy, who can’t learn, do you can?”
“Ain’t look like you can handle it.”
“we both with Joe in first 100 of NAB players by GJ statistics it’s open you know?
and I’m not even active played last 2 month”
Sure i don’t know “how to”
Which is it? It didn’t happen or if it happened it’s not a TOS violation? These are all quotes from you (typos included). Let me know if you need another 50 examples.
3 Likes
@Kweedko The only question I have is: did you post any links to this poll on the English forums for us to see, comment, and vote on before it was closed? Or did you keep this information to yourself because you knew so many of us agree that the new Naval Arcade aiming should be reverted? I see 0 results from you linking to this poll on the forums here:
You obviously know how to post links to the RU forums here on the English forums, you constantly post links that support YOUR opinion, but yet you chose not to link to a poll where we could have had OUR voices and opinions heard? We know that you knew about the RU poll because you have the most replies on that thread:
I am deeply disappointed that we were left unaware of this poll as it was happening, right before this major Naval update. Unless you did post links to this poll on the English forums, I consider any and all future posts and opinions by you 100% biased and untrustworthy.
On my poll thread I made sure to include MULTIPLE options for KEEPING the new Naval Arcade aiming system, and welcomed and supported those who like the new system (even though I do not like it). I even supported you posting your opinions on my poll. I tried to include everyone in the debate, but you chose to help hide the RU poll from us. Shameful.
It also looks like many of the RU forum users are already familiar with your antics and call you out on it, with 7 likes on the post calling you out, and 0 likes on yours: Возврат старого прицеливания в аркадный флот - #6 от пользователя capitan_san - Передано разработчикам - War Thunder — официальный форум So, do you come to the English forums to harass us because you get called out too often on the RU forums?
Looks like many RU players are aware of your biased posts and behavior: Возврат старого прицеливания в аркадный флот - #8 от пользователя Retardo_Da_Vinci - Передано разработчикам - War Thunder — официальный форум
RU players agree that the new Naval Arcade aiming is boring. Again, 0 likes on your post and 5 on the post explaining how the new aiming is boring: Возврат старого прицеливания в аркадный флот - #13 от пользователя Retardo_Da_Vinci - Передано разработчикам - War Thunder — официальный форум
EDIT: Deflection and blame shifting, what a surprise. Saving a screenshot here just in case he tries to delete the post and claim a different story later:
My final reply to him:
4 Likes
So you blaming me that you unaware of RU forums and naval treads there?
Show me where in your so called TOS i violate something. What rule?
Deflecting, what a surprise. So, you do not deny that you intentionally never posted a link to that poll. Your behavior is repugnant. I already blocked you before because of your offensive behavior. That was definitely the correct choice. I will not be wasting any more of my time reading your nonsense. Good luck.
2 Likes
Farewell
Have a nice day. I’m done debating you. The goalposts move too much. Every time I make a point or answer a question, there is a new question or the criteria for answering changes.
2 Likes
So you can’t find the rule?
ps. I never asked you to show my posts, you choose to post them by yourself didn’t understanding the question what was asked.
Have a nice day. Enjoy your matches.
2 Likes
How do you block a player on the forums?
1 Like
Thank you, i will.
I don’t think there is any point in talking to him, he won’t understand this anyway.
I posted this link, because I found this topic today and from our perspective it is an interesting topic. It is clear that the opinion of the Russian community is very similar to ours.
I agree it would be great if we saw this suggestion earlier so we could vote too. The result probably wouldn’t change much, but it would be a good sign to the developers that more players are interested in this suggestion. Unfortunately their topic was closed with only 107 voters, which is not a lot. With more voters there would probably be a better chance that developers would respond to this suggestion, but it’s too late now anyway.
They have a different suggestion system on the Russian forum. The topics there are open only for a week and the voting result is final. We can’t vote there anymore, we can’t post there anymore, it’s over.
Please don’t turn the current topic into anger and blame, because it won’t change anything anyway.
4 Likes
Thank you for the good and positive suggestion 👍 I look forward to continuing our conversations to help make Naval Battles as great as possible 🍻
4 Likes
Go to a user’s profile, top right there is a drop down:
(I did not ignore you lol, just went to get a screenshot)
If you set a user to “Ignored” their posts will be hidden behind this “View Hidden Replies” on threads. You can still click to see and read them, fwiw.
2 Likes
You can create new one on RU forums and vote again.
1 Like
No it isn’t.
You rater give you feedback on new patch and naval state here.
Move along then.
3 Likes