…what?
- your posts are word salads without meaning.
- you’re derailing this already shaky thread, disengage.
Israel can get Chile and Colombian stuff. Adding SAF and IAF stuff to IDF because they have “Partnership” that is not even publicly acknowledged or celebrated is kinda pathetic excuse.
Singapore and India should stay in Britain. Or Singapore can just not exist. the most interesting stuff in their tree is just Hunter F.74 with 4 AIM-9G anyway.
Japan can get Indonesia, Vietnam, Malaysia, and Philippines vehicle instead. Let British Empire ex-member stay in British Empire.
Then it goes to Japan. with the rest of ASEAN filling in Japan’s honestly pathetic tech tree compositions, ground and air alike (Air is only pathetic in post war, while ground can just makes me puke).
- Is your English proficiency that low? I can try translating to a language of your choice.
I explained why one of the more prolific logics of Singapore’s planned location (per the title of the thread) is not reasonable. - It’s quite in topic since we’re discussing the Singapore aspect of this thread. Heck, my second post is more in topic than the initial reply.
1 Like
Wdym double standard? What does China does to Singapore militarily or geopolitically that is notable enough to warrant SG addition to CN tree? There’s fuckload of stuff from Pakistan and Bangladesh that can be shoehorned into CN honestly pathetic tree. And By god I would rather see Mirage 5 ROSE, F-7PG with more advanced missiles like 9L, and ANOTHER CL-13 that isn’t stuck in Kraut tree. And this is still superceded by the need of seeing F-1CK.
6 Likes
I really Would rather have Pakistan and Bangladesh in Chinese tree rather than Singapore. because past 1980s singapore is literal Copy Paste tree with the boring ass F-15 - F-16 - F-35 lineup.
And I mean, so what? If CN can only get CL-13 instead of CA-27, I don’t mind. The tree just need additions because the one we have right now is not good enough.
4 Likes
I’ll stick with what i said above.
-
Singapore shouldn’t even be added into the Game no matter to whom
-
Japan makes even less sense for it to be in than China…or really anyone. France makes more sense than Japan. I don’t get how anyone can say No to it being in China…and then vote for it to be in Japan.
-
For China you at least have some relations not just due to ethnicity but also the influence Singapore had on Post-Mao China.
-
China doesn’t need it…they don’t need any Subtree at all if China would finally get more of its domestic Vehicles and not just Copy+Paste / Export-Slop…no need for Pakistan/Bangladesh either…
-
UK doesn’t need Singapore either and their relation is just ‘used to be a Colony a Century ago’
-
Singapore would add absolutely nothing to whoever gets it except for Copy Paste…
-
Most people here don’t even seem to care about if it makes sense in China or not but just argue against it for the sole purpouse of trashing on China.
3 Likes
I’d chuck molotov if it means CN can get J-15 and J-16 RIGHT NOW.
Its just that Mirage 5 with AIM-9L sounds peak and I would not miss more advanced variant of J-7 that used to nestle in Bangladeshi and Pakistan air force.
1 Like
I’d say Israel is a pretty good place for Singapore. There’s probably the most military connection Singapore has to any country.
I’d also argue especially the F-16D+ and F-15SG, while being similar to the Israeli aircraft, still add a major thing that Israel lacks completely otherwise, which is 4th gen AESA aircraft. Israel right now would have to wait for the F-35 to get any AESA.
Some do, but I don’t think it’s fair to generalize.
That’s never helpful and for many also the reason why they have such a wrong image of the Chinese community in the first place. The same type of generalization gave the impression that the entire Chinese community action was just directed hate at Japan for the sole purpose of trashing on Japan, which also isn’t true for most Chinese players I talked to.
1 Like
Israel is a Mistake. It should’ve stayed a “Folder vehicle nation” in US Tree. there’s not enough vehicle to warrant viable tree but there is enough vehicle to be shoehorned into US tree as “Folders” like F-16 ADF in F-16A Tree by say, Ayit after US F-4, Kfir after F-5E, Kurnass2K after F-4E, SPYDER as compliment to CLAWS, Spike-mounted Namer to compliment unadultered dogshit like HSTVL, and Even Merkava can fill the void in MBT-70 line because be real with me, Aren’t you Tired of 3000 M-60 and Centurion? It’s the most wasteful tree ever. it should not exist as an Independent Nation. it should stay as US Subtree.
Because one is a Thai vehicle that was bought from china, the other is a insane lineup of western afvs and aircraft that have no business going to China, they would ruin the nation and make the game worse. China already will get an Abrams now you want them to get more western aircraft a leopard 2, f15 and f-35? It’s literally taking up space for no reason when china has no shortage of native vehicles.
I think Israel can try a new form ,just have level4-8 and 4 line ,in this form we can have Iberia ,PL with CSFR ,Yugoslavia ,Turkey and ASEAN ,maybe the Korean Peninsula could be in this form
too much of a hassle. better off shoving them back to a bigger tree.
yes ,I’m mainly offering an idea
IMO, all the nation you mentioned above really should just stay subtrees. Even Israel.
What we need is not more tree, but more foldered vehicles. there’s a lot of interesting stuff that are locked behind another nation. And personally rather than shoving it to an existing tech tree it can work like the Italian tech tree before Italy was a nation: As non-premium in premium section.
Shouldn’t Thai vehicles be placed in the Chinese tech tree?
I actually hope Israel can get the earlier ranks filled eventually. Being thrown into rank 4 with lv 0 crew is the main reason I hardly played the techtree.
I also just really enjoy starting a new tree in a way I can get a good amount of low rank vehicles quickly due to the lower RP cost, I feel like it makes it easier to get invested in the techtree.
I think out of these Yugoslavia seems like it could actually work as independent tree, with content pretty much throughout the whole tree. Splitting up into multiple nations in the modern day also saved its viability quite a bit.
Korea could also work, even if the lower tiers might be a bit uninteresting, rank 4+ make up for it with some very interesting vehicles from two major arms manufacturing nations in ground and at least some unique content for air getting better the more modern it gets. Personally I’d still rather see lower ranks with few vehicles over none at all, but I get why an Israel-like system is brought up.
I can also see Korea being split between USA (SK) and China (NK), but the way techtrees are currently organized space might be an issue especially in the US tree.
Israel isn’t doing badly because of being a small nation with little content, it’s doing badly because of Gaijin’s poor development choices. It is being drip-fed content yes, but so are most nations aside from usa and russia. Imo India could very much start at rank 4 the same way Israel does, and they’d actually have more vehicles to offer
Not really. If we strictly go by what nation has the strongest connection and nothing else, then for example the Netherlands would be with Germany rather than France.
I’d also argue that for Thailand this would probably be the USA (most significant supplier) or Japan (had an active military alliance) still over China.
But the connection itself is more of a qualifier, and after that there is still consideration where there is the space or gameplay need for such a subtree.
For this case here I’d say the reason Thailand didn’t go to China is simply the amount of alternatives they have, both domestic and other subtree options. While it is just one of many options for China, for Japan Thailand is one of the very few nations have/had significant positive military relations with.
It’s literally concise. 0/10 bait lmao.