yeah but thats almost every situation at 10.0 and above you gotta get used to it, point and click old west style
I mean if you want to advocate for a narrower matchmaking range i guess i can be on bord with that, but the 2A4 is not struggling at 10.3
Where are you seeing these stats? I know Thunderskill has stats from early 2023, but idk if i had the 2A4 at that point in time
But yeah i recognize when a vehicle is good, and the 2A4 is that
1 Like
theres is absolutelly no situation were you would do just fine in a uptier, some tanks are just more bearable at it
I mean if you want to advocate for a narrower matchmaking range i guess i can be on bord with that, but the 2A4 is not struggling at 10.3
i agree with that
The Strv 121 is still an A4 buddy And I stand corrected, 449-758.
As far as your actual A4 your stats are nothing to boast or make claims about.
i do not agree with that though as it is today, challys, t72s and t80 might be the way to go at this br
well dont be rude to my stats i havent played those for a bit
In ground RB the average KDR is precisely 1:1 as there is no AI.
Getting 2:1 for example results in someone out there with a 0.5:1 KDR.
Above 1:1 is good, and helpful for the team.
Witnessing your name rather explains why one might discount “low” KDR in War Thunder.
This isn’t COD or Battlefield where you have “infinite” lives in a match.
Damn I apologize man I thought this was Diamonds stats…
RIP lol
stats doesnt mean much, not everyone tries hard, u can be bad at something and have an opinion, i personally hate british tanks with all my will even though i have a KDR of 3 with some of them i still think they are trash
I am not sure what your point is, if using KDR is to diminish my argument then that’s just beyond pathetic lol.
I am quite aware how lives work in war thunder. How you use them in a vehicle is what matters.
I have good stats and I use them to back my claims about the tank I main in, as evidence that I am experienced with said vehicle, nothing more.
If you are countering my original claim, I merely expect you to have experience in said vehicle before making a counter argument. Don’t be the guy who doesn’t even have the A4 making an argument about how good it performs and that it would do well against top tier.
Well you can tell a player knows how to use a vehicle from stat’s alone.
Afterall Stats are the compilation of that players suffering and success.
Now win/loss rates on the other hand, mean nothing as that can depend entirely on teams.
they dont mean nothing at all unless the arguing is about whos better at the game, i pretty much know all my lil japanese vehicles better than any other tree in the game, nonetheless i have a much better KDR with british tanks a country that i got to 7.7 br last week and hate most of them
You are delusional, Leopard 2A4 with DM33 vs TURMS is a no contest.
At this point TURMS would only have it’s thermals as an advantage, while sitting only 0.3 BR below, that’s pretty hilarious if you ask me.
Looks like you don’t value things like mobility, gun handling and gun depression at all.
Better armor that would be rendered useless by DM33, so in a head-on engagement armor of both tanks would be irrelevant.
Do you even play this game ?
2A4 with non-expert crew will have 6.9s reload, while TURMS will have 7.1s.
I mean, when you look at a players stats and they are all thousands of deaths to no kills it tells you they are a bot, so stats do matter in some cases. When I see a bot I’ll know I have to potentially take on more targets and or die while they sit AFK till they leave.
If you have a good KD in something it means you are doing something right for that nation/vehicle, you can hate it that’s fine. It still means you have experience and to me, that’s all that matters.
I wouldn’t be too excited to play with a teammate that has a negative KD and expect to have a good game but you never know.
6.9 sec at full tough which means no difference whatsoever, while i do agree depression and gun handling of the t72 turms sucks ass
thats about it, it tells you if the player is somehow good and, across all players, if a vehicle is assigned to the right br, it doesnt prevent them from giving out a feedback on the specific vehicle
But 6.9 is still better than 7.1, meanwhile some people want to spin it other way around.
Also, TURMS’ mobility is quite frankly sub-par for it’s BR.
yeah and? when 3BM42 already done to many tanks long ago.
I don’t know busy bombing Russian with F-16C
I’m amazed you still fail to understand how tanks at a given BR must have their pros and cons when compared to contemporaries.
2A4 has it’s fair share of pros when compared to TURMS, while TURMS’ biggest pro is it’s armor, which you are wanting to negate in whole by adding DM33 to the mix.
No, a tank can’t have only one advantage (which is quite situational as well) while being worse in literally everything else and still be just one BR step lower.