Please no more top tier Russian Tanks

Game Discussion General Discussion
,
43

Yup you have a point there 🫤🐌

44

Do you ?

45

I do care. But it’s just that there are a billion of these threads advocating for these changes and more, and yet after 10+ years, Gaijin is always 1 step forward 2 steps back.

46

Ah yes, that’s exactly the point of this thread 😁👍

47

I was complaining about the premium additions being favored over tech tree ones, which is perfectly within topic.

49

T-14 Armata, Black Eagle, T-90M(2022), (literally tons of prototype tanks).

There’s plenty to add. There’s thousands of prototypes Russia made.

1 Like
50

Well a new btr would be nice

1 Like
51

1- USSR hasn’t gotten a single tech tree tank in over a year.
2- This is a rage topic.

1- Decompression is occurring when Gaijin has the time.
2- This requires complicating all aircraft damage models, not just bombers.
3- Kill stealing is not a problem. It doesn’t even exist, it’s a figment of our imagination.
4- AI overhaul necessary.
5- They do?
6- What?
7- Ribbons are on the player profile tho…
8- ?
9/10- The small maps are restricted to BR 7.7 and below. Half of the maps at top BR are large.
Of course there should be more maps.

T-90M* added in 2023, it was also the last tank ever added to the USSR tech tree.

52
  1. They need to focus on it more.
  2. You are correct, but they should be made better. Currently, bombers suffer the most from the simple damage models, so they should be a priority.
  3. I mostly agree with you. Kill stealing does exist in rare scenarios, but Gaijin should focus more on removing kill denial methods instead.
  4. Not necessarily, Gaijin should be able to nerf naval AA, considering they’re done similar things to aircraft gunners.
  5. New players don’t have access to numbers iirc. I think they prevented new players from getting them around 2022.
  6. They’re talking about the camouflage condition slider on tanks. Right now you aren’t able to change it without a premium account for some reason.

Agreed. But I mostly just want better designed maps, rather than just larger ones. Ideally, medium range engagement is the best, and the map should not funnel players into a specific area.

3 Likes
53

I would love for like 2 major updates where no new top tier vehicles are added. Only lower rank stuff that fills holes.

With the hole in some tech trees, i feel that it prevents them from decompressing since that would expand said holes.

Fill holes and decompress for 2 major updates and i will be pretty happy.

This would be solved by actually giving score for doing damage. Now, like 95% of the score is only given by kills.

If they only fix one gamemode’s maps, please be naval. Worst thing ever to spawn in a cruiser and see most of the enemy team, many battleships, only 9km out with no cover in sight.

54

This post was flagged by the community and is temporarily hidden.

55
  1. Increasing the BR ceiling at least a couple notches isn’t rocket science. Especially now that air and ground modes have their own separate BRs.
  2. A proper fix would require that, but bringing back durability values to pre-2016 level would be a start.
  3. Naval awards a kill only to the player dealing the finishing blow. Unlike with tanks and planes, sinking a ship can take minutes of continuous salvos. For example, you can spend minutes whittling down the enemy ship’s crew until 1% remains. If another player kills the remaining 1% in a single shot they get the kill credit and the lion’s share of the rewards. A “Severe damage”-like mechanic that splits the kill credit after a certain damage threshold would be much more fair.
  4. Good. Modes like Assault absolutely need an AI overhaul anyway.
  5. The amount of number decals is very small and some are paywalled, by small amounts of GE but still. If they aren’t going to let new players have number decals for some dumb reason, at least provide alternatives.
  6. I guess that some vehicles still look too worn down and dirty even with the slider set at 100%. This was a huge pet peeve of mine back in the day.
3 Likes
56

I Agree with everything, especially the bombers being useless rn and the models looking like corroded museum pieces even at 100% camo settings

2 Likes
57

lmao no, not realistic and vastly more common on russian tanks. They also survive top attack missiles far too well

58

It’s not that much more common on Russian MBT’s, and two, that’s a TOW-2B problem. They’re not implemented well at all.

59

Didn’t Russia also got the T-90M at the end of 2023?
Not that i agree with OP, 2024 didn’t have many new top br tanks

60

Yeah but if you ask me the T-90M isn’t even 12.0 worthy. The -4km/h is straight ass.

61

Isn’t that the main weakness that all T72 and derivate have?

I have mixed feeling about calling the T90 not 12.0 worth as i use the C1 in my 12.0 lineup
I’m also grinding the Russian tech tree so sooner or later i Will get it

Ofc the topic Is closed…

62

@live
bro huge map=bad player buff

63