Ghraps made by datamines and custom battles is enough.
And lol, “terrible radar”, maybe it lacks MPFR or TWS for example? Slow scan isnt that bad
That possible and sometimes without pain, but not exact 6, maybe 5-7. More trouble in cables
It’s not “that bad”, it’s worse. The poor ACM range and poor scan rate can easily leave you stuck in a situation where the opponent already has a missile in the air before you can even finish resolving a contact on the scope.
2 Likes
ACM range not really matter, at least if use it in acm
Scan rate matters more, but using SRC PD must help in that
We can do BVR contest. I take F-16C and you take Su-27SM.
3 Likes
- i doesnt want to play wt
- i havent 27SM and theres no point to grind anything in game, at least now
This is very disappointing. You speak like you are an authority on such issues but don’t even have the equipment to make an honest comparison.
4 Likes
Theory is enough.
Su-27 have slower scan rate, but you can compensate it, by using SRC PD
TWS need few scans, to make proper track file
I feel for you brother. That dude talking nonsense with poker face.
🥴
2 Likes
What does data mining tell you about N001 radar?
Tells bar height and their amount, by which you can calculate, how much ticks between every update of target.
Anything else?
Anything else you can find here:
Apart from all these codes, what else information do you acquired by reading these codes?
Let me ask you a question and you give me the answer, which target does N001 likely lock onto: a moving away ai plane, a enemy su27 flying headon, a teammate F-15 flanking
That one you will select
Or if acm - which will be scanned first
In game, your radar can see the ai flying away, a flanking teammate but not head on enemy with N001
1 Like
Just luck and scanning pattern
It is common
Can you elaborate more on the scan pattern, these planes are all in the scan area