Please Gaijin, help Red Team

Game Discussion Simulator Battle
,
223

It’s very hard to see the AIM-9M, but it’s possible. I sometimes see it when I zoom in on the enemy, launch it and follow it with my eyes.

However, if I remember correctly, you can see the launch itself easier.

I fought against Gripens and only got surprised when I wasn’t aware I’m being attacked (they often fly with radars off) or when I notice him too late and I’m expecting him launch, when actually the AIM-9M is already on the way.

I have poor memory of Gripen encounters though.

I’m not trying to argue that AIM-9M’s smokeless motor isn’t a big advantage, it’s more of a casual correction or “umm akshually” type of thing. It’s definitely possible to defend against it.

1 Like
224

But not R-77,R27ER, and other russian, chinese missiles, and it seems that you have no idea how terrible russian and chinese,which is still russian, radars are

225

Do you use VR? It’s hard enough to look back repeatedly in VR without destroying your neck if you do it a lot. (And I’m a fit male in early 20s that goes to GYM)

With no smoke in VR it’s GG

2 Likes
227

I use head tracking. I use a webcam and 2 free programs: AITrack and OpenTrack. It’s a practically free solution.

Any webcam will do, but a better webcam means more stability, faster response time, more accurate movement, no floating (if you try it you will get what I mean) etc.

I was using a 720p 30fps webcam and it was good enough, now with a 1080p 30fps webcam (or 60fps, I don’t remember) it’s much more stable and movement is more snappy, without floating.

I’ve heard VR is blurry, with just head tracking I get full resolution of my 1440p monitor and I run the game in 4K for better antialiasing.

I don’t have any neck pain or anything like that.

There’s also stuff like TrackIR, which is a dedicated head tracking hardware, but it’s expensive.

Edit: Of course it’s not as natural as VR, since you turn your head sideways, look backwards and have to look forward at your screen, but it’s much more intuitive than it seems. You can set mapping curves of how much real head turn equals to how much in-game head turn.

228

You won’t get it with a tracker of course

229

image
image1364×1083 200 KB

image
image1364×1078 194 KB

image
image1908×31 22.9 KB

All I do is win. I don’t think I have lost a single game in top tier or the tier that is just below it since the balancing changes were made.

3 Likes
230

Ghraps made by datamines and custom battles is enough.
And lol, “terrible radar”, maybe it lacks MPFR or TWS for example? Slow scan isnt that bad

231

That possible and sometimes without pain, but not exact 6, maybe 5-7. More trouble in cables

232

It’s not “that bad”, it’s worse. The poor ACM range and poor scan rate can easily leave you stuck in a situation where the opponent already has a missile in the air before you can even finish resolving a contact on the scope.

2 Likes
233

ACM range not really matter, at least if use it in acm
Scan rate matters more, but using SRC PD must help in that

234

We can do BVR contest. I take F-16C and you take Su-27SM.

3 Likes
235
  1. i doesnt want to play wt
  2. i havent 27SM and theres no point to grind anything in game, at least now
236

This is very disappointing. You speak like you are an authority on such issues but don’t even have the equipment to make an honest comparison.

4 Likes
237

Theory is enough.
Su-27 have slower scan rate, but you can compensate it, by using SRC PD
TWS need few scans, to make proper track file

238

I feel for you brother. That dude talking nonsense with poker face.
🥴

2 Likes
239

What does data mining tell you about N001 radar?

240

Tells bar height and their amount, by which you can calculate, how much ticks between every update of target.

241

Anything else?

242

Anything else you can find here:

243

Apart from all these codes, what else information do you acquired by reading these codes?