No.
My earlier text in this thread:
Summary
As an interesting 3rd party reader most of the debate boils down on penetration values of late war shells vs cold war shells as cold war ammo is able to nullify tank design advantages based on protection levels,.
So i fully understand those guys driving 70 ton tanks designed to withstand conventional WW 2 shells (and sacrificing mobility) that they are not happy if they got sniped across the map by a “cheap” cold war light/medium tank due his shell type…
If you would take the Cold War USSR tank development approach as a reference point - they focused on tanks ~ 40 tons with strong firepower, mobility and mass usage, whilst sacrificing protection as the ammo was capable to kill 120 ton tanks, so i might be worth to think about cuts based on pen values…
Dude - i saw some very smart posts of you in the thread about a polish tech tree. So either this is a translation issue, you try to troll me or i was not clear enough: No WW 2 participation = no need to consider.
That gaijins whole nation / TT / sub-tree concept outside WW 2 participants needs an overhaul is more than obvious - don’t tell me that you never heard about the Swiss Hunter or the JP F-16 AJ. This whole mess gets complicated as due to large technology gaps you see a hell of c+p stuff there in order to fill gaps they created.
Don’t get me wrong, i respect your pov as a lot of them make sense - but if you try to change your pov you might accept that others might have different povs on the same topic.
Have a good one!
3 Likes
I was confused about what you replied to me with, Explosive AP = APHE. If i made any mistakes feel free to correct me.
Sorry,my earlier point was if we severing ties with history or have,then there is nothing to stop us using equal ammo or giving 50cal roof mounts to the UK in earlier BR or giving anything to anybody for that matter.
Ka Mi reserve tanks came out in 1942, same year as the Tiger H. How’s that work…?
Do the Independent and the Char tanks play games all by themselves with nobody else around?
The ASU 57 has nothing to go with it and already has scouting (your “solution” to the Pbv, but it doesn’t seem to help it much at all in getting to normal post WWII BRs…), it would get curbstomped.
There’s tons of examples of why this is a bad idea that just doesn’t fit in the game. Unless you have an ACTUAL solution, not “just cram them in anyway and let them get obliterated lolololol.” Which you clearly don’t.
Correct, because the community rallied against Historical Battles and won, & we got far superior realistic battles out of that backlash.
1 Like
What’s the actual goal here?
The existing BR system already stops you from fighting vehicles too effective for you to deal with. So it’s not that. Or if it is, you misunderstand how the BR system works.
The only other reason I can think of is pure “immersion”. Which is not zero importance, but isn’t worth sacrificing the dozens of vehicles from the game’s content that would become orphaned/useless, as discussed just up above in the thread.
You really do talk shit.Spare me the boring stats and give me a game that is fun instead of this souless crap so devoid of immersion. Seriously a custom game against bots is more fun.
1 Like
I gave you literally zero stats. I gave you examples of vehicles you are familiar with in the game, which would be wildly inappropriately matched in your system in ways that are not fun.
You are seriously just trying to bite the bullet and claim the Ka Mi vs the Tiger as “fun?” lmao? With a straight face? Independents fighting 100% other Independents, super fun?
You bored me that is what you did.Like I said a game of US ,USSR or UK vs German bots on a WW2 map set up by me is far superior to any of the crap you spend your time trying to justify.
You bored me that is what you did.
Yeah I know. Trolls are usually bored by people giving hard counterexamples that they don’t have an answer for and not saying anything else. Because it means they can’t easily troll more.
And of course the definition of a troll is anybody who disagrees with you right?
People who disagree without being capable of explaining any reason whatsoever why, yes. Actually.
Like I said I can put together a game that is everything WT should be in two minutes while you fart about with your 80s vs 40s tanks in a modern city with China vs Nazi Germany as your sides.Yet you come away thinking you are clever.So are you here to make a good game or polish your ego?
1 Like
It’s been half an hour, and you can’t figure out how to answer simple questions about just 3 tanks
So no, you can’t figure out what to do with 1,500 tanks in the whole game in 2 minutes if you aren’t even competent enough to answer what to do with 3 tanks in 30 minutes, lol.
Sorry …did you ask me some boring question? Must have dozed off. You really are like the wife I never wanted.Now back to the private warthunder game that is far superior to the public version.
Tell you what, why don’t you just go ahead and spend that mere 2 minutes categorizing every single tank’s era and position? Everyone here would love to know anyway. And doing so will answer my questions above as a bonus automatically. Win win!
What do I win? Your absence?
1 Like
Sure. Also, convincing people to improve the game (since your proposal is going to knock their socks off, of course). Both!
If you are willing, the game engine is open source. Could make a historical war thunder.
1 Like