it still requires to take a position in front of enemy and very random
Man, You made a statment
And I have proved that to be false. Get over it and stop trying to justify being wrong.
1 Like
okay, M36 cant stable front pen enemies
M36 can pen all enemies he meets at his B.R. (frontally)
1 Like
Not stable and reques time for take a good aim, while m18 can just click at side armor
We are talking about front pen. If You need extra aim to use APCR then that is a skill issue.
I think we use different APCR, my cant pen panther ufp if it has 10 degree angle
Why You are shooting at UFP of a panther?
1 Like
Because we saying about front pen of enemies on same BR. show me enemies with flat thick front
You know that turret also has a front?
turret is pennable with m82 causing more damage inside
And what does it change when it comes to:
You can’t just admit being wrong and try to justify it? M36 can pen Tiger II H frontally from a distance greater than 1 km (turret) while M18 can’t. That one situation proves what You say to be false.
1 Like
M36 not met Tiger 2h, M36B2 is meeting but have HEAT that can sometimes even pen UFP
You made a statment that m36 can’t frontally pen enemies that m18 can’t. I have showed what m18 meets and I have showed what m18 meets and what it can’t pen while m36 can
Your image is of an edited quote with context removed…it’s bogus and you know it.
I could find the original post and utterly expose your image as fake…but I have better things to do than waste more time on you.
You were wrong, get over it.
Nowadays, T-34s and American vehicles are commonly alongside German vehicles…which pretty well negates all of that.
One of the many new twists of the last few years.
No is not.
You waste your time in the forum trolling like no tomorrow so that time excuse in a troll fourm like you is even mor stupid, you cant show the original post becuase is the same i show.
Again, next time use you brain if you can find it. Panzer 4 = Hellcat LMAO.
Not at all.
Often I spend my time here explaining matters to people like yourself–the confused and uninformed.
I do it for be charity but I don’t have as much time anymore to do that as I used to (if you looked at my activity, you’d see this but like so many others you don’t read much).
While you may engage in it happily, I am above trolling.
The actual post is far longer and has context…but you know and fear it. Would you just stop lying about it and move on?
You faked the quote, you know it and all it’s done is destroy your credibility. Get over it already…
Not what I said…what I said was far more nuanced and complex.
I suppose I shouldn’t be surprised it went over your head…I am too modest to boast, but my thinking is considerably more advanced than yours.
Nowadays, T-34s and American vehicles are commonly alongside German vehicles…which pretty well negates all of that.
One of the many new twists of the last few years.
That doesn’t make German tanks any better if they have to rely on other nations to compensate for their flaws.
The presence of those Russian/American/supporting vehicles alongside the Germans augments their team’s capability while negating whatever advantages the opposing side would have if the RU/US vehicles would give their own team.
That leaves the Germans’ team in a strong position to be sure…arguably stronger no less.
Not a surprise…you edited the quote so it sounds about right. What really counts is the actual post, which is still visible. If I bother, I’ll point it out.
Beyond that, you’ve gotten stale and boring…you’re just spamming now. (Posting images of people desperately pining for my attention? lol!)
Find something to do with yourself, won’t you?