Vehicle : T-72B(1989)
Gamemode : Ground RB
Change : 10.3 —> 10.7
Reason : It has excellent armor and shells and sufficient mobility. These capabilities are comparable to those of the third generation MBTs of the Western countries, and 10.7 is appropriate.
5 Likes
Vehicle : F14A Iran
Gamemode : Air RB
Change : 13.0 —> 13.3
Reason : incredible good fakours againts jets below 13.0
They have to unless they want yet another problem on their hands.
By now I would be surprised that Gaijin hasn’t found a way to offset this “minor nations have better players” phenomenon, as it’s really simple.
Now compare how much better MSC’s stats are in comparison to the Chally.
TURMS isn’t even close to the 2A4 in performance.
2 Likes
absolutely not, it has no reverse speed, no neutral gear, horrible gun handling
its alright at 10.3, no need to raise it
sure, but you should also raise the pakistaini ud aswell
see turms
3 Likes
Or also just the huge 80mm side angle weakspots that prohibit it from angling.
1 Like
What?
It’s amazing how you don’t understand.
Responding back to only a select few of the suggestions would also feel bad for the people that made their own suggestion and got ignored. You can’t know for sure that their suggestion was worse just because it didn’t get traction.
It has better shell power than the 2A4 and also has better TVD image quality. The armoring of the vehicle is also superior, and the T-72 is probably superior in urban areas.
The slow backward speed is the case with all Soviet MBTs and is not a weakness of this vehicle.
Certainly the Pakistani T-80UD should also have its BR increased.
You can put 1 plane at 14.7 and have no other planes at that BR. Also Rafale really issnt that much better than EFT. FM are almost the same. Only real difference is MICA which only really matter at 4KM range or less.
Better thermals and shell are pretty much the only pros of this vehicle.
Just because many vehicles have bad reverse doesn’t mean it’s not a con lmao.
1 Like
I’d take R60Ms over 9Gs. Any better than a 9G is a nope though.
And the MiG-23 flight model is definitely better than that of a phantom
It is amazing that you cannot properly explain your point without resorting to belittling me. Responding to the few vehicles that spark the most discussion or controversy is the whole point of having a conversation. Acting like every single suggestion needs the exact same response is unrealistic, and trying to frame it otherwise just feels disingenuous. The fact that some ideas naturally get more traction does not mean others are ignored, it just means people are more interested in certain topics. And if a BR change gets a lot of criticism and they still refuse to change it back to the original, then they should at the bare minimum provide a reasoning for this instead of just staying radio silent.
This is just basic PR, any company should understand the importance of keeping their customers in the loop about what is happening in the backend, otherwise they only create more frustration and distrust.
Notice how every non-USSR thing he is putting down in BR, but USSR all up. Joke suggestions.
4 Likes
Because it’s a tank killing machine. They better leave the APDS alone. It’s a reason to play Britain 8.3.
(Many of my ground kills in Falcon are not even with the APDS round, anyway, lol)
1 Like
BI at 6.7 will continue roflstomping entire teams. Should go to 7.3.
Pay2winnin’s Yak-3 to 4.7
Normal Yak-3 to 4.7
Yak-3U and Yak-3VK to 6.0
But this will never happen.
5 Likes
I consider the superior performance of thermals and bullets to be a great advantage .
I think that vehicle-specific and nation-wide weaknesses need to be considered separately.
mmm, shame, Id be interested to see the battles per day to be honest.
To be fair, I’ve really been enjoying the Leo 1a2 when I can drag myself away from my beloved FV107 and Type 16s. So I can see people enjoying the Leo 1 still. I really should get around to grinding the German tree…