We are long overdue for another CV90120, but considering im still waiting for an actually useful 5.x SPAA and a 4.x SPAA i can wait for the other CV90120’s
1 Like
It honestly looked like it was open-top for me. I could honestly 100% see this as an 8.3 event vehicle.
1 Like
9.3 take it or leave it
Would this thing fire APFSDS tho? Was it in service/trials by the moment of this thing?
This looks…. Nice actually.
If anybody wants to support another attempt to fix the Lvakan m/48 please support it for the upcomming BR changelists: Planned Battle Rating changes for August 2025 (updated 16:00, 15.08) - #3054 by karnitin75
1 Like
I still want Ghost, cant wait for it to not get its thermal signature changing ability lol.
Also the MK.IV 120 has a minigun iirc, so strange
hehe boiii
Also i think it has spike launchers
Yeah you can see the gun as the coax
The vehicle had APFSDS-rounds developed parallel to it. Already in the mid-80’s they had tested at least hundreds of these rounds. The idea, if I recall correctly, was that they chose the 40mm so they would be able to fight MBTs from the side. To help with this, they developed APFSDS-rounds. Development rounds were made from tungsten with a length ratio of at least 1:15 to the diameter.
never seen this before
ah wait this is just weird perspective lol
So given sweden lacks any 5.x vehicles and with Danish vehicles and possibly Norwegian ones being added to fill gaps, anyone else hoping to get a Norwegian or Danish Spitfire so we actually have some form a good CAP?
Im pretty sure it dosent get spikes looking at the mock ups. It would have to be in the center blocked by the comanders mast or in the sides where the aps is located also blocking it. Adding a spike launcher and the system to use it would not fit i dont think. (Also remember the massive autoloader and gatling gun modules) that being said it would be absolutely dope if it had spikes
They’re almost obligated to add the Buk given the current state of the Elde.
They won’t though. Though if they’re adding the Buk M3 (which is the one that would make the most sense), I’m not sure we’ll get it on account of the model differences.
There’s also the ITO-12 NASAMS, a non C&P completely of nordic origin. Missile system made by Norway and put on a SAM truck by Finland. It’s pretty much as effective as the IRIST-SLM
This would be preferrable to the others tbh because unlike the swedish IRIS-T or ITO-96, it’s completely original.
1 Like
AFAIK NASAMS can’t fire when sit on truck, that truck is only to move stationary launcher and to deploy it
It can’t be even ‘towed’ as there are no wheel.
Yeah but with the new placing feature it could work just the same. Given that you would have to spawn the trucks with the battery on it then use that truck to place the battery.
Also I wonder if it is capable of firing from the bed on a pinch. No sources to state that though.
It would be a wonderful thing to see more ground vehicles in the Swedish TT. I think the Swedish TT needs more Danish/Norwegian vehicles, such as M41DK and Leopard 2A7DK. At the same time, Sweden still has significant room for development, such as the high-end version of the CV 90 MK.IV (equipped with higher caliber machine guns and active defense systems). Proper copying and pasting can also help improve the Swedish TT, such as the IRIS-T SLM self-propelled air defense vehicle imported from Germany.